Search Results

The turbulent in-cylinder air flow and the unsteady high-pressure fuel injection lead to a highly transient air fuel mixing process in spark-ignition direct-injection (SIDI) engines, which is the leading cause for combustion cycle-to-cycle variation (CCV) and requires further investigation. In this study, crank-angle resolution particle image velocimetry (PIV) was employed to simultaneously measure the air flow and fuel spray structure at 1300 rpm in an optically accessible single-cylinder SIDI engine. The measurement was conducted at the center tumble plane of the four-valve pent-roof engine, bisecting the spark plug and fuel injector. 84 consecutive cycles were recorded for three engine conditions, i.e. (1) none-fueled motored condition, (2) homogeneous-charge mode with start of injection (SOI) during intake (50 crank-angle degree (CAD) after top dead center exhaust, aTDCexh), and (3) stratified-charge mode with SOI during mid compression (270 aTDCexh).

This study compares the role of the in-cylinder flow field for spray-guided stratified-charge combustion and for traditional well-mixed stoichiometric operation, both using E70 fuel. The in-cylinder flow field is altered by changing the engine speed between 1000 and 2000 rpm. The stratified operation with the ethanol blend enabled “head ignition” of the fuel sprays, thus minimizing the available fuel/air-mixing time prior to combustion, creating a highly stratified combustion event. For well-mixed stoichiometric operation, the heat-release rate (HRR) scales proportionally with engine speed due to increased in-cylinder turbulence, as is well-known from literature. In contrast, increasing the engine speed influences the stratified combustion process very differently. Ensemble-averaged over 500 cycles, the time-based HRR in kW remains comparatively unchanged as the engine speed increases. However, cyclic variability of the stratified combustion increases substantially with engine speed.

The lean-burn stratified-charge DISI engine has a strong potential for increased thermal efficiency compared to the traditional throttled SI engine. This experimental study of a spray-guided stratified-charge combustion system compares the engine response to injection-timing retard for gasoline and E85. Focus is on engine-out NO and soot, and combustion stability. The results show that for either fuel, injection-timing retard lowers the engine-out NO emissions. This is partly attributed to a combination of lower peak-combustion temperatures and shorter residence time at high temperatures, largely caused by a more retarded combustion phasing. However, for the current conditions using a single-injection strategy, the potential of NO reduction with gasoline is limited by both elevated soot emissions and the occurrence of misfire cycles. In strong contrast, when E85 fuel is used, the combustion system responds very well to injection-timing retard.

This study is an experimental and computational investigation of the influence of injection timing, fuel spray orientation, and in-cylinder air motion on the combustion, fuel economy, and engine-out emissions of a single-cylinder, 2-valve, spark-ignition direct-injection (SIDI) engine, operating under stratified-charged conditions. For the best compromise between fuel consumption, combustion stability, engine-out hydrocarbon emissions and smoke, the engine required relatively retarded injection timings (in comparison to other charge- or wall-controlled DI engines), high swirl levels, and a spray orientation that is directed towards the intake-valve side and targets the ridge wall of the piston.