Refine Your Search

Search Results

Viewing 1 to 8 of 8
Standard

Design and Performance Specifications for a Generic Buck Representing a Small Family Car Used in the Assessment of Pedestrian Dummy Whole Body Impact Response

2019-01-08
J3093_201901
This Information Report addresses the design and performance specifications for a generic buck to be used in full-scale vehicle to pedestrian tests conducted to evaluate pedestrian dummy performance. Specifically, the buck is designed to mimic the impact response of the front end of a sedan within the small family car class during a collision with a pedestrian. The goal is to develop a generic buck with simplified geometry and a limited number of components made of clearly defined and readily available engineering materials to facilitate fabrication and reproducibility. To ensure performance of the buck, it is specified that the buck mimics the maximum crush distance, absorbed energy, and maximum force corresponding to a sedan within the small family car class during a pedestrian impact.
Standard

Human Mechanical Response Characteristics

2013-02-21
J1460_201302
While this report does not include a discussion of all of the available data defining human response or address all body areas, for those areas addressed it does utilize references generally judged by those in the field to be practical and meaningful guidelines for the development of human surrogates. This report is intended to be a “living” document that will be updated periodically. A number of problems need to be addressed in defining human impact response characteristics. There is the problem of human response variability from subject to subject in volunteer tests. There is the problem of extrapolating such volunteer data which are obtained at low impact severities to higher impact severities using human cadaver response data obtained at injurious levels of impacts. Live animal experiments have been conducted over the years in an attempt to define human impact response and tolerance.
Standard

Human Tolerance to Impact Conditions as Related to Motor Vehicle Design

2011-02-21
J885_201102
This report reviews current1 quantitative data on human tolerance levels without recommending specific limits. Data developed on humans (including cadavers) are presented where available; however, in many cases animal data are provided where no suitable human results have been reported. This report confines itself, as much as possible, to information of direct use to the automotive designer and tester. Data of only academic interest are largely omitted; therefore, J885 should not be considered as a complete summary of all available biomechanical data. Most of the data cited in this report applies to adult males since little information is available on women or children. The summary data provided in the tables should be considered in conjunction with the accompanying descriptive test. This material explains the manner in which the data were obtained and provides an insight as to their limitations.
Standard

HUMAN MECHANICAL RESPONSE CHARACTERISTICS

1985-03-01
J1460_198503
While this report does not include a discussion of all of the available data defining human response or address all body areas, for those areas addressed it does utilize references generally judged by those in the field to be practical and meaningful guidelines for the development of human surrogates. This report is intended to be a “living” document that will be updated periodically. A number of problems need to be addressed in defining human impact response characteristics. There is the problem of human response variability from subject to subject in volunteer tests. There is the problem of extrapolating such volunteer data which are obtained at low impact severities to higher impact severities using human cadaver response data obtained at injurious levels of impacts. Live animal experiments have been conducted over the years in an attempt to define human impact response and tolerance.
Standard

HUMAN TOLERANCE TO IMPACT CONDITIONS AS RELATED TO MOTOR VEHICLE DESIGN

1980-04-01
J885_198004
This report reviews current1 quantitative data on human tolerance levels without recommending specific limits. Data developed on humans (including cadavers) are presented where available;however in many cases animal data are provided where no suitable human results have been reported. This report confines itself, as much as possible, to information of direct use to the automotive designer and tester. Data of only academic interest are largely omitted; therefore J885 APR80 should not be considered as a complete summary of all available biomechanical data. Most of the data cited in this report applies to adult males since little information is available on women or children. The summary data provided in the tables should be considered in conjunction with the accompanying descriptive text. This material explains the manner in which the data were obtained and provides an insight as to their limitations.
Standard

HUMAN TOLERANCE TO IMPACT CONDITIONS AS RELATED TO MOTOR VEHICLE DESIGN

1966-10-01
J885A_196610
This SAE Information Report provides data regarding human tolerance to impact conditions. This information is based on currently available knowledge and experience in the biomechanics field. However, in utilizing the information set forth, it must be recognized that both experience and data in the field of biomechanics are limited and, in some cases, unrefined. It is intended that all portions of the report be subjected to continuing review and that it be revised as additional knowledge and experience would warrant.
Standard

HUMAN TOLERANCE TO IMPACT CONDITIONS AS RELATED TO MOTOR VEHICLE DESIGN

1964-03-01
J885_196403
This SAE Information Report provides data regarding human tolerance to impact conditions. It is intended that this information will aid those having to do with the planning or designing of motor vehicles in which people may experience high forces, to so design various components to reduce the likelihood or severity of injury. This information is based on currently available knowledge and experience in the biomechanical field. However, in utilizing the information set forth, it must be recognized that both experience and data in the field of biomechanics are extremely limited and, in some cases, unrefined. It is intended that all portions of the paper be subjected to continuing review and that it be revised as additional knowledge and experience would warrant.
X