Search Results

The primary function of an engine mounting bracket is to support the powertrain system in all road conditions without any failure. The mount has to withstand different road conditions and driving maneuvers which exert loads on it. Also, it is challenging to change the mounting locations and types after the engine is built; hence it is paramount to verify the mounting brackets against all abuse loads in the design stage. The Car manufacturers ensure engine mount bracket design meets CAE's (Computer-aided engineering) static and fatigue load cases. The CAE is performed using digital RLD (Road load data) loads. The design checks cumulative strain or stress against specified service life requirements during break and fatigue FOS (Factor of safety) calculations. However, it is difficult to simulate the material's fracture toughness to estimate the effect of the impact load on the mounting bracket.

Today, reducing the vehicle development time is a very crucial task. In the early development stages, the limited time and few vehicle prototypes are available for validation. In such scenarios, durability validation of different design iterations of critical components like engine mounts, with respect to the real road usage is a challenge. Road simulation testing in a laboratory is a reliable approach to fatigue and durability tests for the evaluation of platforms, components and subassemblies. Durability evaluation of engine mount is, generally, performed either at assembly level, using multi-axial road simulation approach or at component level, using uniaxial sinusoidal load testing. The new testing approach here allows testing of engine mounts at component level using road simulation approach by applying multi-axial loads or deflections as per the real road usage conditions.

Powertrain mounts locations and stiffness in vehicle plays very important role in improving vehicle noise and vibration, which is caused by engine firing forces and road disturbances. Once locations are finalized, based on initial calculation and packaging then it is very much critical to play with mount stiffness to achieve required NVH level in vehicle. This paper describes the effect of mount stiffness on the bolted joint integrity. Stiffness fine tuning is done to improve vehicle level NVH and various iteration are done with change in stiffness values of A, B and C mounts. When stiffness specifications are finalized, it is recommended to acquire road load data on the finalized stiffness mount and check for bolted joint integrity since load signature is varying significantly on mount w.r.t stiffness change. If we change mount stiffness value from 128N/mm to 98N/mm, then loads on particular mount is getting increased from 4.5KN to 6.5KN in one of the track testing.

In electric vehicles, the powertrain mounting system design has challenges different from conventional internal combustion engine (ICE) powertrains. Due to the absence of source noise, the customer predominantly experiences the buzz, squeak and rattle (BSR) noise. The 6 degrees of freedom (DOF) modal frequency target is less stringent than a three-cylinder or four-cylinder ICE powertrain. The durability loads in EV also differ due to less powertrain weight. In this paper, a study has been carried out about balancing all three main performance parameters of modal decoupling, BSR and durability through powertrain mount design optimization. The article shows that a carryover ICE powertrain mount has typical issues in Electric Vehicle (EV). A case study has discussed in detail how to manage those issues. Finally, it is concluded that a particular focus is required during an early stage of mount design to address these challenges for an EV.

The growing demand of fuel and cost saving on vehicle, today’s vehicle manufacturer are working on various weight reduction initiative in EV. Lighter weight vehicle have bigger challenges to meet NVH requirement. There are two types of EV called modified and adopted EV’s are commonly in use. The sub frame type of EV system comes under the category of modified EV. In this paper, a mounting system is studied and compared for a cradle type EV as well as sub frame or saddle type EV. MATLAB based optimization tools are used for parameter optimization. The focus is put on the optimization of mounting system location and stiffness for energy optimization, CoG and TRA-EA optimization. The best engine mounting system is compared and adopted based on simulation. 12 DOF studied to address high frequency resonance issues for a sub frame type EV. Finally robustness of the system is checked based on various simulation and optimization.