Search Results

Driven by global demands for improved fuel economy and reduced emissions, significant improvements have been made to engine designs and control systems, vehicle aerodynamics, and fuel quality. Improvements, such as the continuously slipping torque converter, have also been made to automatic transmissions to increase vehicle efficiency. Recently, belt-continuously variable transmissions (b-CVTs) have been commercialized with the promise of significant fuel economy improvements over conventional automatic transmissions. Automotive traction drive transmissions may soon join belt-CVTs as alternative automatic transmission technology. Much of the information reported in technical and trade publications has been on the mechanics of these traction drive systems. As automotive traction drives move closer to commercial reality, more attention must be given to the performance requirements of the automotive traction fluid.

New technologies are being commercialized across the automotive industry to address demands for improved fuel economy, emissions reductions, and improved customer satisfaction. Push-belt continuously variable transmissions (b-CVTs) are beginning to command a significant percentage of the market now dominated by manual and conventional automatic transmissions. In addition, automobile manufacturers plan to introduce the first traction drive toroidal-CVTs to the market place within the next five years. A review of the relative benefits and limitations of each of these automatic transmissions exists in the literature. In this paper we consider how the performance requirements of each of these automatic transmission systems impact automatic transmission fluid technology. The physical characteristics and screen test performance of two commercial ATFs, a b-CVTF, and two traction fluids were examined.