Search Results

A series of designed experiments (DOE) was used to optimize the seat and orifice designs in a multi stream gasoline direct injector. The goal of the experiments was to minimize the effects of fuel deposits on the injector performance. Two different engines were used in the test campaign. One engine, a centrally injected turbocharged 1.6L four cylinder, was used to run a three factor full factorial DOE that tested the effects of SAC volume design, tip design and combustion seal position. Another, a centrally injected turbocharged 3.0L six cylinder, was used to run a three factor full factorial and a four factor half factorial DOE. The three factors in the full factorial were orifice hole divergence, orifice hole surface finish and the use of an inert amorphous silicon coating. A fourth factor, hydro erosive grinding of the orifice holes, was added to facilitate the calculation of a four factor half factorial DOE with only four additional engine tests.

The majority of hydrocarbon (HC) emissions in the FTP cycles are generated during cold starts when the catalyst is cold, and a large percentage of the injected fuel does not vaporize well. D Dduring this portion of the test, a wall film builds on the intake ports, fuel drips into the cylinder, and manifold pressure changes cause excursions in the air/fuel ratio (AFR). This paper presents the concept of heating fuel inside an injector to enhance vaporization in the intake manifold. Different injector parameters, such as heater temperature and injector tip geometry, were analyzed for different flow rates. The heat transfer inside the injector was investigated experimentally and numerically, using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling. The Sauter Mean Diameter (SMD) of the fuel spray was measured and evaluated under different vacuum conditions using a Phase Doppler Particle Analyzer (PDPA).