Search Results

Turbocharging, increasing the compression ratio, and downsizing a spark-ignition engine are well known strategies for improving vehicle fuel economy. However, such strategies increase the likelihood of engine knock due to higher in-cylinder pressures and temperatures. A high octane fuel, such as E85, effectively suppresses knock but is not necessary in most parts of the engine operating map. To better utilize a high octane fuel, dual fuel injection has been suggested where high octane fuel is injected only when the engine is about to knock. However, the effects of downsizing, retarding spark timing, and increasing compression ratio on dual fuel applications are not well understood. To investigate these questions, GT-power simulations along with engine experiments and engine-in-vehicle simulations for a passenger vehicle and a medium-duty truck were conducted.

High octane fuel (e.g., E85) effectively suppresses knock, but the octane ratings of such fuels are much above what is required under normal driving conditions. It is important, therefore, to understand the octane requirement of the engine itself over its full range of operation and apply that knowledge to practical driving cycles to understand fuel octane utilization, especially of a turbocharged engine. By carefully defining knock limits, the octane requirement of a 2-liter turbocharged spark ignition engine was experimentally quantified over a wide range of loads and speeds using PRF blends and gasoline-ethanol blends. Utilizing this knowledge and engine-in-vehicle simulations, the octane requirements of various driving cycles were calculated for a passenger car and a medium duty truck model.