Search Results

Exhaust emissions of seventeen 2,3,7,8-substituted chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin/furan (CDD/F) congeners, tetra-octa CDD/F homologues, twelve WHO 2005 chlorinated biphenyls (CB) congeners, mono-nona CB homologues, and nineteen polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from a model year 2008 Cummins ISB engine equipped with aftertreatment including a diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC) and wall flow copper or iron urea selective catalytic reduction filter (SCRF) were investigated. These systems differ from a traditional flow through urea selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalyst because they place copper or iron catalyst sites in close proximity to filter-trapped particulate matter. These conditions could favor de novo synthesis of dioxins and furans. The results were compared to previously published results of modern diesel engines equipped with a DOC, catalyzed diesel particulate filter (CDPF) and flow through urea SCR catalyst.

This paper summarizes the Heavy-Duty In-Use Testing (HDUIT) measurement allowance program for Particulate Matter Portable Emissions Measurement Systems (PM-PEMS). The measurement allowance program was designed to determine the incremental error between PM measurements using the laboratory constant volume sampler (CVS) filter method and in-use testing with a PEMS. Two independent PM-PEMS that included the Sensors Portable Particulate Measuring Device (PPMD) and the Horiba Transient Particulate Matter (TRPM) were used in this program. An additional instrument that included the AVL Micro Soot Sensor (MSS) was used in conjunction with the Sensors PPMD to be considered a PM-PEMS. A series of steady state and transient tests were performed in a 40 CFR Part 1065 compliant engine dynamometer test cell using a 2007 on-highway heavy-duty diesel engine to quantify the accuracy and precision of the PEMS in comparison with the CVS filter-based method.

A 5.9 liter medium-heavy-duty diesel engine, meeting the emissions performance of a MY 2000 US heavy-duty on-highway engine, was tested with and without a diesel exhaust emission control system consisting of catalyzed diesel particulate filters and adsorber catalysts NOx arranged in a four-flow path configuration. This four-flow path system represents a significant reduction in catalyst volume when compared to previous systems tested by EPA. The goal of this project was to achieve high NOx reduction over the Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine Federal Test Procedure (HDDE-FTP) and Supplemental Emission Test (SET), consistent with the 2007 U.S. heavy-duty engine emissions standards, using this reduced volume system. Supply of hydrocarbon reductant for NOx adsorber regeneration was accomplished via a secondary exhaust fuel injection system.

With input from industry, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) has developed ramped modal versions of its steady-state certification duty cycles for land-based nonroad diesel engines. The Ramped Modal Cycle (RMC) calls for gathering gaseous and particulate emissions continuously over the cycle, while the steady-state test specifies that samples be taken for only a portion of the time at each mode. The RMC test was developed in part to capture discrete regeneration events associated with advanced catalyst systems like NOx adsorbers that are anticipated to meet future nonroad emission standards.1 To compare the emission levels between these two tests, a 5.9 liter medium-heavy-duty on-highway diesel engine rated for 260 hp @ 2500 rpm, was run at EPA's National Vehicle and Fuel Emissions Laboratory (NVFEL), derated to 180 hp @ 2500 rpm, to simulate the configuration of a typical nonroad engine.

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) adopted the Low Emission Vehicle (LEV) III regulations in January 2012, which lowered the particulate matter (PM) emissions standards for light-duty vehicles (LDVs) from 10 milligrams per mile (10 mg/mile) to 3 mg/mile beginning with model year (MY) 2017 and 1 mg/mile beginning with MY 2025. To confirm the ability to measure PM emissions below 1 mg/mile, a total of 23 LDVs (MY pre-2004 to 2009) were tested at CARB's Haagen-Smit Laboratory (HSL) (10 LDVs) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency's (US EPA) National Vehicle and Fuel Emissions Laboratory (NVEFL) (13 LDVs) using the federal test procedure (FTP) drive schedule. One LDV with PM emissions ranging from 0.6 - 0.8 mg/mile was tested at three CARB HSL test cells to investigate intra-lab and inter-lab variability. Reference, trip, and tunnel filter blanks were collected as part of routine quality control (QC) procedures.