Search Results

Today's emerging 4-wheel-drive and all-wheel-drive vehicle architectures have presented new challenges to engineers in achieving low driveline system noise. In the meantime there's also a constant pressure from increasingly stringent noise level requirements. A driveline system's NVH (noise, vibration and harshness) performance is controlled by various noise sources and mechanisms. The common noise issues include the axle gear whine, driveline imbalance/run-out, 2nd order kinematics, engine torque fluctuation, engine idle shake etc. Unfortunately various design alternatives may improve some NVH performance attributes while degrading others. It is important to balance the requirements for these noise sources to achieve an optimized driveline system NVH. However, very little literature is found on this topic. In this paper, discussions on methodologies in balancing these different driveline NVH requirements are presented.

In the current automotive industry, it is common that the driveline subsystem and components are normally from different automotive suppliers for OEMs. In order to ensure proper system integration and successful development of driveline system NVH performances, collaboration efforts between OEMs and suppliers are very demanding and important. In this paper, a process is presented to achieve successfulness in developing and optimizing vehicle integration through effective teamwork between a driveline supplier and a major OEM. The development process includes multiple critical steps. They include target development and roll down, targets being specific and measurable, comprehension of interactions of driveline and vehicle dynamics, accurate definition of sensitivity, proper deployment of modal mapping strategy, which requires open data sharing; and system dynamics and optimization.