Search Results

Collision related data stored in the airbag control modules (ACM's) of Toyota vehicles can provide useful information to collision investigators, including both front and rear collision severity. Previous studies of ACM's from other manufacturers found that the devices underestimated the actual speed change in low speed frontal collisions. To quantify the accuracy and sensitivity of select 2005 to 2008 Toyota ACM's, in-vehicle crash tests and linear sled tests were performed in both front and rear impact orientations. A 2005 Toyota Corolla with five extra ACM's mounted in the right front seat position underwent a series of vehicle-to-barrier collisions with speed changes of up to 10 km/h. Next, the same six Toyota ACMs underwent a range of crash pulses using a linear sled. In all in-vehicle tests, the speed change reported by the ACM underestimated the actual speed change for frontal collisions, and overestimated the actual speed change for rear-end collisions.

Crash data stored in the airbag sensing and diagnostic modules (SDMs) of General Motors vehicles can provide useful information for accident investigators. To quantify the accuracy and sensitivity of select 2003 to 2004 SDMs, two types of tests were performed. First, three 2004 vehicles underwent 136 vehicle-to-barrier and vehicle-to-vehicle collisions with speed changes up to 8 km/h. Second, 2003 and 2004 model year SDMs underwent a range of crash pulses using a linear sled. In all of the tests the speed change reported by the SDM underestimated the actual speed change. The speed change underestimates ranged from 0.2 to 2.9 km/h except for several anomalous tests in which the underestimate was as high as 12.3 km/h. The magnitude of this error varied with crash pulse shape. Increasing crash pulse duration and decreasing peak acceleration increased the difference between the actual and SDM reported speed change. The threshold accelerations for the SDMs tested ranged from 1.1 to 2.7g.

Most 1999 and newer General Motors (GM) vehicles have an event data recorder (EDR) that can record pre-crash speed incorporated into the airbag sensing and diagnostic module (SDM). The accuracy of the SDM-reported pre-crash speed over a wide range of speeds has not been previously tested and reported. In this study, the SDMs of three late-model GM passenger cars were artificially triggered while driving at a constant speed between 1 and 150 km/h. The SDM-reported pre-crash speeds were compared to speeds measured by a calibrated 5th-wheel of known accuracy. The results showed that the accuracy of the SDM-reported pre-crash speed varied with both speed and vehicle. The overall uncertainty associated with all three SDMs tested varied from a 1.5 km/h overestimation of vehicle speed at low speeds to a 3.7 km/h underestimation of vehicle speed at high speeds.

The accuracy of the speed change reported by Generation 1 Toyota Corolla Event Data Recorders (EDR) in low-speed front and rear-end collisions has previously been studied. It was found that the EDRs underestimated speed change in frontal collisions and overestimated speed change in rear-end collisions. The source of the uncertainty was modeled using a threshold acceleration and bias model. This study compares the response of Generation 1, 2 and 3 Toyota EDRs from Toyota Corolla, Camry and Prius models. 19 Toyota airbag control modules (ACMs) were mounted on a linear sled. The ACMs underwent a series of frontal and rear-end haversine crash pulses of varying severity, duration and peak acceleration. The accuracy and trigger thresholds of the different models and generations of EDRs were compared. There were different accuracy trends found between the early Generation 1 and the more modern Generation 2 and 3 EDRs.

Data downloaded from event data recorders (EDRs) integrated into the airbag systems of passenger vehicles can be key evidence for collision investigators. Often the EDR data includes information about the severity of the collision in terms of the longitudinal and lateral speed changes experienced by the vehicle. Previous studies have shown that for collisions with small lateral speed changes, the accuracy of the reported longitudinal speed change varies with manufacturer and magnitude. The goal of this study was to quantify the accuracy of EDR-reported speed changes in high-speed angled collisions with larger lateral speed change components. Data from 25 crash tests conducted for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA’s) Oblique Offset Frontal Impact Research and Development Program were used in this study.

The accuracy of collision severity data recorded by event data recorders (EDRs) has been previously measured primarily using barrier impact data from compliance tests and experimental low-speed impacts. There has been less study of the accuracy of EDR-based collision severity data in real-world, vehicle-to-vehicle collisions. Here we used 189 real-world front-into-rear collisions from the Crash Investigating Sampling System (CISS) database where the EDR from both vehicles recorded a severity to examine the accuracy of the EDR-reported speed changes. We calculated relative error between the EDR-reported speed change of each vehicle and a speed change predicted for that same vehicle using the EDR-reported speed change of the other vehicle and conservation of momentum. We also examined the effect of vehicle-type, mass ratio, and pre-impact braking on the relative error in the speed changes.

Collision data stored in the airbag sensing and diagnostic module (SDM) of 1996 and newer GM vehicles have become available to accident investigators through the Vetronix Crash Data Retrieval system. In this study, two experiments were performed to investigate the accuracy and sensitivity of the speed change reported by the SDM in low-speed crashes. First, two SDM-equipped vehicles were subjected to 260 staged frontal collisions with speed changes below 11 km/h. Second, the SDMs were removed from the vehicles and exposed to a wide variety of collision pulses on a linear motion sled. In all of the vehicle tests, the speed change reported by the SDM underestimated the actual speed change of the vehicle. Sled testing revealed that the shape, duration and peak acceleration of the collision pulse affected the accuracy of the SDM-reported speed change. Data from the sled tests were then used to evaluate how the SDM-reported speed change was calculated.