Search Results

Aerodynamic simulation results are most of the time compared to wind tunnel results. It is too often simplistically believed that it suffice to take the CAD geometry of a car, prepare and run a CFD simulation to obtain results that should be comparable. With the industry requesting accuracies of a few drag counts when comparing CFD to wind tunnel results, a careful analysis of the element susceptible of creating a difference in the results is in order. In this project a detailed 1:4 scale model of the Hyundai Genesis was tested in the model wind tunnel of the FKFS. Five different underbody panel configurations of the car were tested going from a fully paneled car to a car without panels. The impact of the moving versus static ground was also tested, providing over all ten different experimental results for this car model.

Wheel drag is generally known to be proportional to the wheel opening area. However, predicting wheel drag through opening area is still very difficult and inaccurate because there are many other factors that affect wheel drag. To more accurately and effectively predict wheel drag in the early styling design stage, we introduced the wheel average depth (WAD) parameter and developed S/W to calculate WAD. As a result of analyzing the correlation between WAD and wheel drag for HKMC's mass-produced wheels, the R2 value was greatly improved compared to the correlation between the existing wheel opening area and wheel drag, and the prediction accuracy was doubled.