Search Results

With the introduction of stringent particulate number (PN) limits and real driving emission (RDE) requirements, gasoline particulate filters (GPFs) have been widely adopted in Europe and China. GPFs can be coated with different amounts of three-way catalyst (TWC) coating. Some applications use large amounts of washcoat (>100g/L) whereas some don’t use at all. Pressure drop (DP) and PN filtration efficiency (FE) are the top two design criteria. It is important to understand how various coating technologies can be applied to GPF technologies for optimized FE/DP performance. To study filter and coating interaction, a matrix of coated GPFs was prepared and tested for lab DP and vehicle PN based FE. The matrix includes samples with a wide range of washcoat loadings (WCLs), differing coating technologies that target more coating inside GPF filter walls (Tech A) or more on the surface of filter walls (Tech B), and GPF technologies with high and low mean pore size (MPS).

A simple 1-dimensional filter model, with symmetric and asymmetric channels, has been developed to investigate the fundamental behavior and performance of ceramic partial diesel particulate filters (PFs). The governing equations of mass and momentum are similar to those of a full DPF [7, 15]. A standard DPF with the plugs at its inlet face removed has been referred to as a ‘rear-plugged PF’ while, one with the plugs at the outlet face removed has been referred to as a ‘front-plugged PF’ in the present study. Removal of some of the plugs from a standard ceramic DPF reduces the (i) overall pressure drop (ΔP) across the filter, (ii) filtration efficiency (FE) of the DPF, and (iii) manufacturing cost. Partial filters stand a high chance of being deployed in diesel exhaust after-treatment systems for the emerging markets (Brazil, Russia, India, China) that follow Euro 4 emission regulations.

As the China 6 light duty vehicle emission regulation is being implemented, PN becomes a challenge for vehicle type-approval emission tests. WLTC has replaced NEDC as the Type-I test cycle on the chassis dynamometer with more dynamic driving events. In addition, on-road RDE test is a challenge to calibrate the engine to meet tailpipe PN emissions because of the nature of the on-road conditions, i.e. varying ambient temperature, driving dynamics, altitude, etc. In response to China 6 requirements, GPF technology has been introduced. In this study, we pulled four China 6 compliant gasoline vehicles for the PN emission survey. The selected vehicles covered typical engine technologies including GDI/MPI with natural aspiration/turbo charger, representing the state of the art of the local engine capability. On one hand, it helps to build insight into the status of China 6 engine emission control technology through WLTC and RTS95 tests.

The heavy duty (HD) Eu VII regulations, going into effect starting 2027, has aggressive particle number (PN) emissions limits under extended operating conditions compared to existing Eu VI framework. In addition to the proposed hot-start PN limit of 2.0E+11 #/kWh, which is a >65% reduction vs. Eu VI E, the particle size cut-off is being extended from 23nm+ to 10nm+ while also including nearly all field operating conditions such as regeneration events, wider ambient boundaries etc. The tighter limits coupled with a work-based window approach to evaluate emissions is driving the need for the next generation of ultra-high filtration efficiency (FE), diesel particulate filter (DPF) technologies. The current study evaluates the FE performance of different DPF solutions under development, over a range of challenging on-road conditions characterized by frequent high temperature events which are not actively triggered.

Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) and battery electric vehicles (BEVs) are considered as primary paths in China to meet corporate average fuel consumption (CAFC) credit and new energy vehicle (NEV) credit regulations. Many local original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) develop PHEVs based on their internal combustion engine (ICE) base models without significant modification on engine side. Traditional ICE vehicles are solely driven by engines, while PHEVs can be driven by engine or electric motors, independently or together, depending on powertrain architecture and operating strategy. PHEVs may have more particle number or particulate matter (PN/PM) emissions. To meet CN6 regulation, gasoline particulate filters (GPFs) are widely used for both PHEV and traditional cars. It is important to investigate the impacts of hybrid powertrain on gasoline particulate filter applications.