Search Results

The development process of 2-stroke engines is characterized by limited CFD investigations in combination with long-term development phases on the test bench with high prototype costs. To reduce the costs and to realize shorter development time together with a higher prediction quality of the engine potential, a higher implementation level of 1D and 3D simulation tools into the development process is necessary. This publication outlines the 1D simulation methods in the layout phase of GDI combustion processes of 2-stroke engine categories. By means of conceptual investigations, the demands, the potential and the limits of 1D CFD simulation methodology are defined. Using a comparison between 1D and 3D or 1D/3D coupled simulation methods the limits of solely 1D simulation are shown. For advanced simulation tasks with a higher demand for prediction quality, the entire engine is simulated in 1D, whereas special parts of the engine design are simulated in a 3D model.

In the early phase of an engine development process, the main characteristics of an engine setup, such as lengths, diameter and volumes, are usually defined by means of 1D CFD simulation technologies. Only single flow situations are modeled in 3D due to the high expenditure of time and money. This paper presents a new efficient development methodology using 1D, 3D as well as coupled 1D/3D simulation techniques - the described simulation strategy leads to a more realistic and more comparable reproduction of the flow situation, especially in the critical areas of the simulation domain, while avoiding the restrictions and disadvantages of 1D and 3D simulation. By the use of test bench results of a comparable prototype engine, the quality of the simulation strategy has been successfully verified.