Search Results

In order to meet emission norms, modern day diesel engines rely on methods of in cylinder emission reduction and expensive exhaust after treatment devices. Engine manufacturers across the world are finding it hard to maintain balance between customers' demand for better fuel consumption and obeying the stringent legislative emission regulations. Optimum combination of variables such as piston bowl shape, compression ratio, fuel injection and turbo charging systems precisely matched with engine, Exhaust Gas Re-circulation (EGR) rate etc can result in refined combustion leading to better engine out emissions as well as fuel efficiency. Optimization of piston bowl geometry and EGR rate would require a lot of experiments, which involves cost and time. If the numbers of variants of piston bowl shapes or EGR rates are more, so would be the expensive and require more testing time.

Global development trend in diesel engine is to extract more power from the same engine thereby increasing the brake mean effective pressure (BMEP). With increase in the engine BMEP, maintaining reliability of the pistons and piston ring set becomes challenging as mechanical and thermal loading increases simultaneously. Reliability can be maintained by changing the material to higher grade and/or applying different coatings; however this involves significant cost and development time. It is always preferred to keep the same material and improve the reliability of parts. In this work the BMEP of a heavy duty medium speed diesel engine is increased by 10% (from 22.8 bar BMEP to 25 bar BMEP) without change in the piston or piston ring set material. This is achieved by studying the effect of existing piston bowl shape and then changing the shape to improve the reliability of piston and piston ring set. A systematic 6 step methodology is followed.

Indian emission norms for stationary Gensets are upgraded from CPCB I to CPCB II. These new emission norms call for a significant change in emission limits. CPCB II emission norms call for 62% reduction in NOx+HC and 33% reduction in particulates for engines above 75 kW up to 800 kW power range compared to existing CPCB I norms. CPCB II norms are more stringent as compared to European Stage IIIA and CEV BS III. To meet equivalent emission norms in US and Europe most of the engine manufacturers have used Common Rail Direct Injection (CRDI) or electronic unit injection as the fuel injection technology. This paper describes mechanical fuel injection solution for meeting CPCB II emission norms on engines between 93 kW up to 552 kW with acceptable fuel consumption values. The paper presents simulation and experimentation work carried out to achieve the norms for the said power ratings.