Search Results

The quality of material model input files for finite element analysis (FEA) is a fundamental factor governing the fidelity and accuracy of simulations at a sub-system or a vehicle level, dictating an investment of due diligence in developing and validating the material models. Several material models conventionally employed for FEA typically allow accounting for only uniaxial tensile behavior of the material; however, the models may be required to predict component-level response in a complex loading scenario. Therefore in developing LSDYNA material input files for such models, it becomes critical to validate their performance in alternative loading scenarios. For out-ofplane loading, typically a three or four-point bending load-case is used for validation. Simulating three point bending (TPB), particularly in the quasi-static regime, requires detailed representation of the moving pin impacting the specimen, and sliding of the specimen on the stationary pins.

Thermoplastics find application in many automotive components. Off late, hardware testing is supplemented by analysis using finite element (FE) codes. One of the factors determining the analysis accuracy is the representation of the components with suitable material models. While a uniaxial tensile test on the specimens typically provides engineering stress-strain data, material plasticity models in commercial FE solvers, such as LS-DYNA and ABAQUS, require equivalent plastic strain versus true stress as input. Engineering stress and strain can be converted to the corresponding true stress and true strain using equations based on the constant volume assumption; however, these equations are valid only up to the point of necking.