Search Results

Incompatibility between two colliding cars is becoming an important issue in passive safety engineering. Among various phenomena, indicating signs of incompatibility, over-riding and under-riding are likely caused by geometrical incompatibility in vertical direction. The issue of over-riding and under-riding is, therefore, not only a problem for partner-protection but also a possible disadvantage in self-protection. One of the possible solutions of this dual contradictory problem is to have a good structural interaction between the front-ends of two cars. Studies have been done to develop a test protocol for assessment of this interaction and to define criteria for evaluation but mostly in terms of aggressivity, which is a term describing incompatibility of a relatively stronger car. In this study, it was hypothesized that homogeneous front-end could be a possible better solution for good structural interaction.

A finite element model of the human lower extremity has been developed in this study to simulate lower extremity behavior in frontal car crashes. Precise geometry of the human lower extremity and material properties of the hard and soft tissues were introduced to the model. The performance of the model was evaluated by comparing with dynamic loading test data using post mortem human subjects (PMHS). The comparison proved its ability to estimate dynamic responses of the human lower extremity. A study was conducted using the model to investigate possible factors of loading to the ankle and tibia. Force and moment were calculated with different time history profiles of footwell intrusion and pelvis motion. The results suggested that timing of maximum intrusion was important as well as its magnitude. It was also found that loading to the tibia could be affected not only by intrusion but also by pelvis motion.

When considering a CTC (car to car) frontal crash between a small light car and a large heavy car, it is necessary to evaluate the stiffness and strength of each vehicle body. As interactive force at the contact surface cannot be measured directly in a car to car crash test, a simplified practical method has been developed to estimate the interactive force based on the vehicle deceleration. The adequacy and consistency of the proposed method was verified by using the principle of conservation of energy. The calculated force-deformation curves revealed that the interactive force reached the maximum designed strength of the small light car based on the ODB (Offset Deformable Barrier) test for crash protection, while the force level was far below the corresponding design limit of the large heavy car. It was observed that the relatively lower stiffness of the small light car resulted in absorbing a larger share of the total input energy of the system when crashed into the large heavy car.

In a CTC (car to car) crash, interaction between two vehicles is quite important. Interaction is primarily described by the contact area between two vehicles but interaction force (impact force) is also important for the entire crash phenomenon. In a frontal crash, impact force is resisted by the body structures, engine block, and tires. The resultant share of energy absorption, as well as the magnitude of body deformation, is greatly affected by the force profile. It is desired, therefore, to evaluate those factors of vehicle bodies in order to achieve CTC compatibility. There are some technical obstacles, however, in measuring those factors in testing. Impact force, for instance, cannot be measured directly in a CTC crash test unless load cells are installed in body frames. It is also difficult to analyze body deformation in a CTC crash test because both vehicles are moving.

In total, 865 intersection car-to-car crashes (NASS-CDS CY 2004-2014) are analyzed in detail to determine the injury level outcome based on different crash factors, such as delta-V, age, airbag deployment, number of events, impact locations (F,Y,P,Z,D,B-regions based on CDC codes), amount of compartment intrusion and impact angle. A multivariate logistic regression test was performed to predict the probability of MAIS3+ serious injuries using lateral delta-V, location of maximum deformation from B-PLR, age (0: <60/1: ≥60 years), number of events (0: single/ 1: multiple), intrusion (0: <16cm/ 1: ≥16cm), side airbag deployment (yes/no) and direction of impact (0: 9/ 1: 10 o’clock). It is found that direction of impact is one of the significant (p<0.05) parameters and 10 o’clock angle impact has more influence than 9 o’clock perpendicular lateral impact. Frequency of AIS3+ injuries was high in Y-region impact cases.