Search Results

As the automotive industry prepares to roll out an unprecedented range of fully electric propulsion vehicle models over the next few years - it really brings to a head for folks responsible for brakes what used to be the subject of hypothetical musings and are now pivotal questions for system design. How do we really go about designing brakes for electric vehicles, in particular, for the well-known limit condition of descending a steep grade? What is really an “optimal’ design for brakes considering the imperatives for the entire vehicle? What are the real “limit conditions” for usage that drive the fundamental design? Are there really electric charging stations planned for or even already existing in high elevations that can affect regenerative brake capacity on the way down? What should be communicated to drivers (if anything) about driving habits for electric vehicles in routes with significant elevation change?

At elevated temperatures, such as those encountered under race track or fade test conditions, the closed-form solution to the lumped capacitance model for characterizing brake cooling (fitted to a standard cooling test temperature range) tends to break down and provide an inaccurate representation of brake rotor cooling behavior. Accurate prediction of cooling is fundamental to brake system component sizing and selection of materials at the early stages of a vehicle program; this is especially true of a high performance vehicle with track performance requirements. To this end, alternative approaches to characterizing brake cooling have been examined to determine their suitability for use in measurement and simulation of brake performance.

The friction material is arguably at the heart of any brake system, with its properties taking one of the most important roles in defining its performance characteristics. High performance applications, such as race track capable brake systems in high powered vehicles, exert considerable stress on the friction materials, in the form of very high heat flux loads, high clamp and brake torque loads, and high operating temperatures. It is important, for high performance applications, to select capable friction materials, and furthermore, it is important to understand fully what operating conditions the friction material will face in the considered application.

One of the most apparent and often most objectionable characteristics of brake system performance during race track usage is the increase in pedal travel caused by lining taper wear, lining compression, and knockback. However, it is difficult to measure compliance on individual brake corners during race track usage, and complex apply profiles make it challenging to even quantify the overall change in pedal feel of the brake system. This paper proposes a methodology by which the measured hydraulic pressure profiles of each brake corner during a brake apply are related to overall brake pedal travel. Using regressed parameters describing these relationships, a Mahalanobis-Taguchi ‘Normal Space’ is constructed for a set of brake applies with known ‘good’ pedal feel. This provides a basis for computing the Mahalanobis Distance for brake applies in a data set under evaluation. Brake applies with a high Mahalanobis Distance can be ‘flagged’ for further evaluation.

In racetrack conditions, brake systems are subjected to extreme energy loads and energy load distributions. This can lead to very high friction surface temperatures, especially on the brake corner that operates, for a given track, with the most available traction and the highest energy loading. Individual brake corners can be stressed to the point of extreme fade and lining wear, and the resultant degradation in brake corner performance can affect the performance of the entire brake system, causing significant changes in pedal feel, brake balance, and brake lining life. It is therefore important in high performance brake system design to ensure favorable operating conditions for the selected brake corner components under the full range of conditions that the intended vehicle application will place them under. To address this task in an early design stage, it is helpful to use brake system modeling tools to analyze system performance.

Recent years have seen an increased emphasis on producing automobiles with a ‘performance’ image, and a corresponding level of performance capability. Greatly increased engine power and cornering ability naturally lead to the need for increased braking capability. With more and more vehicle programs developing, validating and advertising their performance at the racetrack, the need arises for objective means of measuring brake performance and differentiating between brake system configurations under these driving conditions. One of the greatest challenges of measuring brake performance during racetrack driving conditions is coping with the wide range of braking conditions and driving styles incurred. Rapid brake applies and releases, and brake modulation make it very difficult to get a meaningful measure of brake output.

The modern braking system in the field today may be controlled by over a million lines of computer code and may feature several hundred moving parts. Although modern brake systems generally deliver performance, even with partial failures present in the system, that is well above regulatory minimums, they also have a level of complexity that extends well beyond what the authors of existing regulations had envisioned. Complexity in the braking system is poised for significant increases as advanced technologies such as self-driving vehicles are introduced, and as multiple systems are linked together to provide vehicle-level “features” to the driver such as deceleration (which can invoke service braking, regenerative braking, use of the parking brake, and engine braking). Rigorous safety-case analysis is critical to bring a new brake system concept to market but may be too tedious and rely on too many assumptions to be useful in the early architecting stages of new vehicle development.

The validation of brake discs has remained, to this day, heavily reliant on “Thermal Abuse” or “Thermal Cracking” type testing, with many procedures so dated that most engineers active in the industry today cannot even recall the origin of the test. These procedures - of which there are many variants - all share the trait of greatly accelerating durability testing by performing repeated high power (high speed and high deceleration) brake applies to drive huge temperature gradients and internal stress, and often allowing the disc to get very hot, to where the strength of the material from which the disc is constructed is significantly degraded. There is little debate about whether these procedures work; by and large disc durability issues in the field are extremely rare.