Refine Your Search

Search Results

Viewing 1 to 3 of 3
Technical Paper

Toyota Status Report on Low Emission Concept Vehicles

1972-02-01
720487
The status of Toyota's development of low emission concept packages- 1. NOx and HC/CO Catalytic Converter and EGR, 2. Thermal Reactor, NOx and HC/CO Catalytic Converter and EGR and their components is described. Variations of thermal reactor design, performance and durability characteristics are discussed. Above the throttle valve entry EGR has been found to have desirable flow characteristics with a simple control system. EGR rate over 15% brings about unacceptably poor driveability and fuel economy with smaller vehicles. Many types of catalytic converters for pelleted catalysts have been designed and examined for their performance and durability. A down-flow type converter has relatively good flow distribution and warm-up characteristics. As for HC and CO, a few prototype vehicles have met the 1975 Federal Regulation at low mileage, but the 1976 regulation for NOx of 0.4 gm.
Technical Paper

Engine Control Optimization for Smaller Passenger Cars

1978-02-01
780590
The optimization on an engine-three way catalyst-vehicle system for best fuel economy under the constraints of emissions and driveability, has been studied for a smaller passenger car with 1.6 litter 4 cylinder engine. Full utilization of a computer was intended for the accumulation of basic data and a search for optimum calibration. An automatic Engine Test System ( AETS ) was developed. The optimum calibration was calculated for the engine-vehicle system with three-way catalyst based on the optimal control theory, and was implemented on an actual vehicle by an engine controller in which a 16 bits microprocessor was used. The results showed good agreement.
Technical Paper

The Effects of Combustion Chamber Design and Compression Ratio on Emissions, Fuel Economy and Octain Number Requirement

1977-02-01
770193
Four combustion chamber designs and three compression ratios (8:1, 9:1, and 10:1) were investigated for their emission, fuel economy, and octane number requirement characteristics using a 1.6 L (96.9 CID) 4-cyl engine. Time resolved measurement of hydrocarbon emissions was carried out to clarify the reason for differences in tail pipe emission between these combustion chambers. The “High Turbulence Type” combustion chambers, which included swirl (piston swirl) and/or squish, indicated better fuel economy under emission and octane number requirement constraints. The HC emission of the combustion chamber with squish and swirl was lower than that of the combustion chambers with squish alone. The time resolved measurement of HC emissions explained the difference in the exhaust process of these unburned hydrocarbons.
X