Search Results

Current numerical simulation practice does not capture the seat mounted Side Airbag (SAB) breaking out through the seat tear seam and its correct early deployment characteristics. A late SAB breakout negatively impacts full SAB deployment and occupant coverage. An early breakout enhances timely SAB positioning and coverage, providing early cushioning to the occupant from the intruding barrier. This paper presents a numerical modeling process capable of predicting and enhancing seat tear seam breakout time and early SAB deployment kinematics. The critical phases used in the development of SAB breakout modeling process are as follows: Phase 1: Physical Tear Seam and Seat Trim coupon tests to characterize physical material properties for the numerical material model development; Phase 2: Numerical Modeling of the Tear Seam and Seat Trim breakout and, Phase 3: Numerical prediction of SAB breakout through a candidate seat tear seam.

This paper presents a systematic study to assess maturity of Corpuscular Particle Method (CPM) to accurately predict airbag deployment kinematics and its overall responses. The study was performed in three phases: (1) a correlation assessment of CPM predicted inflator characteristics to closed tank tests; (2) a correlation assessment of CPM predicted airbag deployment kinematics, airbag pressure, reaction force from a static deployment of a Driver Airbag (DAB) and (3) a correlation prediction of the impactor force by CPM versus impactor force from physical drop tower tests. These studies were repeated using the Uniform Pressure Method (UPM), to compare the numerical methods for their accuracy in predicting the physical test, computational cost, and applicability. Results from the study suggest that CPM satisfies the fundamental energy laws, and accurately captures the realistic airbag deployment kinematics, especially during the early deployment stage, unlike UPM.