Search Results

Ethanol based fuels have seen increased use in recent years due to their renewable nature as well as increased governmental regulatory mandates. While offering performance advantages over gasoline, especially at high compression ratios, these fuels are more sensitive to pre-ignition (PI). Pre-ignition experiments using ethanol (E100) and E85 were performed in a CFR spark ignition engine using a diesel glow plug “hot spot” to induce PI. PI is found to occur over a specific air-fuel ratio range based on hot spot temperature. Additionally, increasing ethanol content or compression ratio (CR) decreases glow plug temperature thresholds for PI. A kinetics-based model was used to simulate pre-ignition of E100 and to elucidate sensitivities of pre-ignition to various operating parameters, including initial charge temperature, air dilution, and residual dilution. The model shows that the most violent cases of PI can be mitigated by switching to either lean or rich operation.

Seven biofuel-diesel fuel configurations were tested in a single-cylinder research diesel CFR engine that allowed variable injection timing. These seven configurations included three biodiesel-diesel blends (20% and 100%); two ethanol-diesel blends (15% and 20%), and two cases in which ethanol was injected into the intake air flow (20% and 33%). Combustion characteristics, NOx emissions, and soot emissions were compared with diesel operation across a range of injection timings. The effect of fuel compressibility affected the timing of injection, with biodiesel-diesel blends having advanced injection and ethanol-diesel blends having delayed injection. Biodiesel-diesel blends showed reduced ignition delay with only modest changes in combustion duration, while ethanol-diesel mixtures showed longer ignition delay but much shorter combustion duration and earlier phasing.

In the near future increasing use of ethanol in motor fuels will occur due to legislative mandates. E10 (Gasohol) and E85 will see more widespread use in spark ignition engines. This study looks at the performance and knock characteristics of E10 and E85 in comparison to regular gasoline. Detailed experimental engine data and analysis as a function of compression ratio, ignition timing and fueling are presented with associated physical explanations. Comparative results are presented. Increasing ethanol content provides for greater engine torque, efficiency and knock tolerance, yet fuel consumption worsens. Knock limited trends and sensitivities are presented, for example, 5 degrees of spark retard are required with E10 and gasoline for each compression ratio increase, while the much less sensitive E85 requires only 2 degrees of retard for each compression ratio increase. Trends with efficiency and torque are described amongst the fuels tested.