Search Results

A comprehensive investigation on the impact of piston design on scavenging and combustion in an opposed- piston, opposed-cylinder (OPOC) two-stroke engine is carried out and presented in this paper. Two-stroke engines, in general, have superior power densities and brake thermal efficiencies. Compared with opposed-piston (OP) engines, the OPOC architecture comprises only one crankshaft instead of two, and all the forces generated on the piston go to this one crankshaft via a common bearing, thus making the engine structure inherently simple, lightweight, compact and efficient. Due to the piston motion of the OPOC engine, two opposing injectors were mounted at the center of the cylinder wall for each cylinder. This unique feature posed challenges on air entrainment for air/fuel mixing because of the inherent limited space for injection spreading angle near top-dead-center (TDC).

Opposed piston two-stroke (OP2S) diesel engines have demonstrated a reduction in engine-out emissions and increased efficiency compared to conventional four-stroke diesel engines. Due to the higher stroke-to-bore ratio and the absence of a cylinder head, the heat transfer loss to the coolant is lower near ‘Top Dead Center.’ The selection and design of the air path is critical to realizing the benefits of the OP2S engine architecture. Like any two-stroke diesel engine, the scavenging process and the composition of the internal residuals are predominantly governed by the pressure differential between the intake and the exhaust ports. Without dedicated pumping strokes, the two-stroke engine architecture requires external devices to breathe.