Search Results

Washcoat sintering and substrate meltdown have traditionally been the principle deactivating mechanisms of catalysts fitted to two-stroke engines. The reduction of the excessively high HC and CO levels responsible for these effects has therefore been the focus of considerable research which has led to the introduction of direct in-cylinder fuel injection to some larger versions of this engine. However, much less attention has been paid to the effects of oil and its additives on the performance and durability of the two-stroke catalyst. The quantity of oil emitted to the exhaust system of the majority of two-stroke engines is much greater than in four-stroke engines of comparable output due to the total loss lubrication system employed. The fundamental design of the two-stroke also permits some of this oil to ‘short-circuit’ to the exhaust in a neat or unburned form.

The most common mode of deactivation suffered by catalysts fitted to two-stroke engines has traditionally been thermal degradation, or even meltdown, of the washcoat and substrate. The high temperatures experienced by these catalysts are caused by excessively high concentrations of HC and CO in the exhaust gas which are, in turn, caused by a rich AFR and the loss of neat fuel to the exhaust during the scavenging period. The effects of catalyst poisoning due to additives in the oil is often regarded as a secondary, or even negligible, deactivating mechanism in two-stroke catalysts and has therefore received little attention. However, with the introduction of direct in-cylinder fuel injection to some larger versions of this engine, the quantities of HC escaping to the exhaust can be reduced to levels similar to those found on four-stroke gasoline engines.

A study of fuel injection during the open cycle of a small spark ignition two-stroke cycle engine has been carried out. A manually controlled electronic fuel injection system has been used as this appears to have many advantages over mechanically controlled equipment. Various injection locations were considered and injection timing and air/fuel ratio varied at each position to determine optimum power and bsfc requirements. The results presented are compared with baseline carburation and with fuel injection into the intake to assess the potential improvements gained from each injector location.