Search Results

Quick-release chokes may become an essential feature of advanced exhaust emission control systems to minimize emissions during warmup. However, quick-release chokes greatly impair warmup driveability when gasolines of conventional volatility are used. Consequently, modifications of gasoline volatility were investigated as one approach to restoring warmup driveability with quick-release chokes. Warmup driveability of two test cars equipped with quick-release chokes was measured on a chassis dynamometer at 40 and 68 F using fuels with widely different volatility characteristics. Warmup driveability was essentially restored by increasing fuel volatility in the 40-90% ASTM distillation range. Front-end volatility up to the 40% point had very little effect.

Single-cylinder engine tests, an analytical engine cycle simulation, and automobile tests were employed to study the effects of supplementing gasoline with water for use in spark ignition engines. Factors examined include: the method of water addition (both water-in-gasoline emulsions and direct manifold water addition), antiknock characteristics with water addition, MBT spark requirement, indicated engine efficiency, engine cooling requirement, exhaust emissions, volumetric efficiency, lean operating limit, smoke level, exhaust temperature, and vehicle driveability. Among the negative aspects of water addition were increased hydrocarbon emissions and decreased vehicle driveability. Also, the polyoxyethylene type of emulsifier used in the water-in-gasoline emulsions, gave poor fuel stability and caused a rapid buildup of engine deposits. However on the positive side, water-gasoline fuels have higher octane ratings and decrease nitric oxide emissions.

Methanol, a popular alternative fuel candidate, can theoretically be dissociated on-board a vehicle into a 2/1 molar mixture of hydrogen (H2) and carbon monoxide (CO) having a 14 percent greater heating value than that of methanol vapor. In this study, engine efficiency and fuel consumption with methanol vapor and dissociated methanol (simulated by a 2/1 mixture of Ha and CO) were compared in a single-cylinder engine at equivalence ratios (Φ’s) ranging from 0.5 to 0.9 and compression ratios (CR’s) from 11 to 14. Whan compared at the same Φ and CR, the reduction in fuel consumption for dissociated methanol compared to methanol (3-7 percent) was smaller than would be expected based on heating value alone. Indicated thermal efficiency with dissociated methanol was only 0.89-0.55 times that with methanol. Thermodynamic analyses were conducted to isolate the factors responsible for lower efficiency with dissociated methanol.