Search Results

Testing methods and SAE Recommended Practices were developed for evaluating both the ability of a truck cab to resist roof loading in a rollover environment and the occupant kinematics and injury potential for occupants in a 90-degree heavy truck rollover. In evaluating a heavy truck roof for its ability to resist rollover loads, real-world accident data was analyzed and full-scale tests were performed to define the rollover environment. It was found that testing methods currently in place for passenger cars were not sufficient to represent the loading mechanisms that typically occur in a heavy truck rollover. An SAE Recommended Practice (RP) for both dynamic and quasi-static roof load testing was developed, and tests were conducted to evaluate their use. To evaluate heavy truck occupant safety in a 90-degree rollover, independent of roof intrusion, a rollover simulator was developed. The simulator allows occupant restraints, seats, and interiors to be evaluated for injury mechanisms.

This paper describes a straight-forward, automated approach to performing sensitivity analyses using Monte Carlo simulation techniques. Probability distributions are assigned to key input parameters, and results are expressed in the form of probability distributions of each of the desired output parameters. With this technique, it is possible to obtain quantitative results regarding the probability of results being within selected ranges. The approach is fast and automated, and provides a rational basis for dealing with uncertainty and ranges of parameters in accident reconstruction analyses.

Considerable research has been dedicated to establishing the amount of energy absorbed during different types of collisions. In the early 1960’s, motor vehicle manufacturers began conducting barrier crash tests consistent with SAE suggested procedures. This allowed investigators to establish the amount of energy that went into metal deformation in the tested vehicle. Over the years, there have been many advances in establishing the amount of crush energy in a particular accident, including the development of several computer programs. Four two-vehicle, single-moving rear-impact crash tests were conducted to compare the effect of override and offset. Override comparisons were made using a moving, rigid barrier or a heavy truck as the impactor, and each pair of tests having either offset or full rear engagement. All four tests were conducted using a like make and model four-door sedan as the target vehicle. Each test had the same available crush energy for the car.