Search Results

This report discusses the development of brain injury tolerance criteria based on the study of three model systems: the primate, inanimate physical surrogates, and isolated tissue elements. Although we are equally concerned with the neural and neurovascular tissue components of the brain, the report will focus on the former and, in particular, the axonal elements. Under conditions of distributed, impulsive, angularacceleration loading, the primate model exhibits a pathophysiological response ranging from mild cerebral concussion to massive, diffuse white matter damage with prolonged coma. When physical models are subjected to identical loading conditions it becomes possible to map the displacements and calculate the associated strains and stresses within the field simulating the brain. Correlating these experimental models leads to predictive levels of tissue element deformation that may be considered as a threshold for specific mechanisms of injury.

This study was conducted to collect data and gain insights relative to the mechanisms and factors involved in hip injuries during frontal crashes and to study the tolerance of hip injuries from this type of loading. Unembalmed human cadavers were seated on a standard automotive seat (reinforced) and subjected to knee impact test to each lower extremity. Varying combinations of flexion and adduction/abduction were used for initial alignment conditions and pre-positioning. Accelerometers were fixed to the iliac wings and twelfth thoracic vertebral spinous process. A 23.4-kg padded pendulum impacted the knee at velocities ranging from 4.3 to 7.6 m/s. The impacting direction was along the anteroposterior axis, i.e., the global X-axis, in the body-fixed coordinate system. A load cell on the front of the pendulum recorded the impact force. Peak impact forces ranged from 2,450 to 10,950 N. The rate of loading ranged from 123 to 7,664 N/msec. The impulse values ranged from 12.4 to 31.9 Nsec.