Search Results

Tensile measurements and fracture surface analysis of low carbon heat-treated boron steel are reported. Tensile coupons were quasi-statically deformed to fracture in a miniature tensile testing stage with custom data acquisition software. Strain contours were computed via a digital image correlation method that allowed placement of a digital strain gage in the necking region. True stress-true strain data corresponding to the standard tensile testing method are presented for comparison with previous measurements. Fracture surfaces were examined using scanning electron microscopy and the deformation mechanisms were identified.

Elastomers are widely used in many automotive components such as seals, gaskets etc., for their hyperelastic properties. They can undergo large strain and can return to their original state with no significant deformation making them suitable for energy dissipation applications. Most common testing procedures include uniaxial tension, pure shear, biaxial tension and volumetric compression under quasi-static loading conditions. The results from these tests are used to generate material models for different finite element (FE) solvers, such as LS-DYNA. Commonly used material models for elastomers in LS-DYNA are the Ogden Material Model (MAT77), which uses parameter-based approach and the Simplified Rubber Material Model (MAT181), which uses tabulated input data. Prediction of rate dependent behavior of elastomers is gaining interest as, for example, during a crash simulation the components undergo impact under different strain rates.

Thermoplastics find application in many automotive components. Off late, hardware testing is supplemented by analysis using finite element (FE) codes. One of the factors determining the analysis accuracy is the representation of the components with suitable material models. While a uniaxial tensile test on the specimens typically provides engineering stress-strain data, material plasticity models in commercial FE solvers, such as LS-DYNA and ABAQUS, require equivalent plastic strain versus true stress as input. Engineering stress and strain can be converted to the corresponding true stress and true strain using equations based on the constant volume assumption; however, these equations are valid only up to the point of necking.