Search Results

Palladium catalysts are known to show higher methane oxidation performance than platinum and/or rhodium catalysts. In this paper, the higher oxidative dehydrogenation activity on palladium is proposed as a reason for the superior methane oxidation. When other oxidation reactions are considered, higher affinity of palladium to oxygen has also been suggested[1]. In this study, oxygen chemical potential on platinum and palladium catalyst surfaces under oxidation conditions was measured using a specially designed electrochemical sensor. The oxygen chemical potential was calculated from the sensor potential by the Nernst equation. As a result, oxygen potential on palladium during the methane oxidation reaction was found to be much higher than that of platinum, correlating with affinity to oxygen and higher methane oxidation performance. The rate of oxygen adsorption and desorption on platinum and palladium was evaluated in an engine experiment using a dual lambda-sensor procedure.

Palladium is well known to catalyze methane (CH4) oxidation more efficiently than platinum (Pt) and/or rhodium (Rh) catalysts. The mechanism for methane oxidation on palladium is hypothesized to proceed via a radical intermediate. Direct identification of a radical species was not detected by Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy (ESR). However, indirect evidence for a radical intermediate was found by identification of ethane (C2H6), the methyl radical(CH3 ˙ ) coupling product, by Mass spectroscopy analysis under CH4/O2 conditions.

Electronics has greatly contributed to the operation of internal combustion engines. This is especially evident in the benefits that it has brought to drivers, such as enhancing the “Fun to Drive” experience and in reducing the cost of fuel. Moreover, this progress has resulted in minimizing environmental degradation, and yet continuing to support improvements in performance. In the diesel engine, which has superb fuel economy, the innovative progress has been achieved by the common rail technology. The common rail system has the features of high injection pressure control in all engine speed range, highly precise injection control and multiple injections per combustion cycle. The latest 2nd generation of the DENSO common rail system features 1800 bar injection pressure, and five times multiple injection with fully electronic control to ensure precise small injection quantities. This technology has been commercialized into passenger car products in the European market.