Search Results

The government, automotive industry and scientific community are currently scrutinizing the adequacy of the FMVSS #216 roof crush standard in the United States. As a result of concern about the ability of FMVSS #216 to enforce reasonable protection to occupants in rollovers, The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has recently published a Request For Comments in the Federal Register regarding updating this standard1. The inverted drop test methodology is a promising alternative test procedure to evaluate the structural integrity of roofs and is being considered by NHTSA as a possible compliance test. Recent testing on many different vehicle types indicates that damage consistent with field rollover accidents can be achieved through inverted drop testing at very small drop heights. Drop tests matrices were performed on 9 pairs of vehicles representing the majority of personal transportation vehicle types.

Inverted drop testing of vehicles is a methodology that has long been used by the automotive industry and researchers to test roof integrity. In our laboratory, the inverted drop test methodology was employed on late model production vehicles to simulate the damage incurred by a real world rollover accident. The extent and shape of residual damage matched well with the corresponding accident damage. Modified vehicles were reinforced based upon previously documented techniques. Incorporation of these techniques demonstrated a significant increase in roof strength and corresponding reduction in roof crush with minor weight addition. Finally, a production vehicle and structurally enhanced vehicle were drop tested with instrumented Hybrid-III occupants. This pair of tests confirms that reduction of roof intrusion and increased headroom can significantly enhance occupant protection. It also highlights the need to maintain adequate survival space for the vehicle’s occupants.

Experimental results from three point bending and axial compression tests of common automotive roof elements are presented. Modifications of these components were also tested to evaluate the effect of structural reinforcements and void filling. Under three-point bending, an open hat section side header (or side rail) was tested and failed in a manner consistent with observed failures in real world accidents. Modifying the hat section to create a closed section increased load capacity and energy absorption, and demonstrated some gains in strength to weight performance. Two epoxy compounds in a similar closed section configuration resulted in substantial increases in peak load, energy absorption and strength-to-weight ratio. In the axial compression tests, a open “c” section front header were tested in axial compression and failed just past a sheet metal reinforcement consistent with observed failures in real world accidents.