Search Results

Determining the validity of the design space early in the conceptualization of a project can make the difference between project success and failure. Early assessment of technical feasibility, project risk, technical readiness and realistic performance expectations based on models with different levels of fidelity, uncertainty, and technical robustness is a challenging mission critical task for large procurement projects. Tradespace exploration uses model-based engineering analysis, design exploration methods, and multi-objective optimization techniques to enable project stakeholders to make informed decisions and tradeoffs concerning the scope, schedule, budget, performance and risk profile of a project. As the intersection with a number of project stakeholders, tradespace studies can provide a significant impact upon the direction and decision-making in a project.

Tradespace analysis is used to define the characteristics of the solution space for a vehicle design problem enabling decision-makers (DMs) to evaluate the risk-benefit posture of a vehicle design program. The tradespace itself is defined by a set of functional objectives defined by vehicle simulations and evaluating the performance of individual design solutions that are modeled by a set of input variables. Of special interest are efficient design solutions because their perfomance is Pareto meaning that none of their functional objective values can be improved without decaying the value of another objective. The functional objectives are derived from a combination of simulations to determine vehicle performance metrics and direct calculations using vehicle characteristics. The vehicle characteristics represent vendor specifications of vehicle subsystems representing various technologies.

Modeling and simulation of ground vehicles can be a computationally expensive problem due to the complexity of high-fidelity vehicle models. Often to determine mobility metrics, multiple stochastic simulations need to be evaluated. Surrogate models, or models of models, offer a means to reduce the computational cost of these simulation efforts. Since various types of surrogate models are available to the user, choosing the best surrogate model for a simulation is mostly the challenging process. In this paper, the process of selecting surrogate models and its uses based on model metafeatures is presented. The approach formulates this decision as a trade-off among three main drivers, required dataset size (how much information is necessary to compute the surrogate model), surrogate model accuracy (how accurate the surrogate model must be) and total computational time (how much time is required for the surrogate modeling process).

The integration of electric motors into ground vehicle propulsion systems requires the effective removal of heat from the motor shell. As the torque demand varies based on operating cycles, the generated heat from the motor windings and stator slots must be rejected to the surroundings to ensure electric machine reliability. In this paper, an electric motor cooling system design will be optimized for a light duty autonomous vehicle. The design variables include the motor cradle volume, the number of heat pipes, the coolant reservoir dimensions, and the heat exchanger size while the cost function represents the system weight, overall size, and performance. The imposed requirements include the required heat transfer per operating cycle (6, 9, 12kW) and vehicle size, component durability requirement, and material selection. The application of a nonlinear optimization package enabled the cooling system design to be optimized.