Search Results

Emission studies and component analyses were carried out on Clear-fueled and MMT®-fueled 100,000 mile Escort vehicles from the Alliance study [SAE 2002-01-2894]. Previously reported analyses of these vehicles indicated that all differences in emission system performance could be attributed, with a 90% confidence level, to the engine cylinder head, spark plugs, oxygen sensors, and catalysts [SAE 2004-01-1084]. These parts from the Clear and MMT®-fueled vehicles were further analyzed to determine the root causes of the differences in emission system performance. The intake/exhaust valves, fuel injectors, and EGR valves from the cylinder heads were tested, individually and in groups, for differences in vehicle emission performance. Deposits from the exhaust valves of the MMT®-fueled vehicle were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDX), and shown to resemble Mn3O4 with partial substitution of Zn2+ for Mn2+.

Vehicle evaluations and model calculations were conducted on a vacuum-insulated catalytic converter (VICC). This converter uses vacuum and a eutectic PCM (phase-change material) to prolong the temperature cool-down time and hence, may keep the converter above catalyst light-off between starts. Tailpipe emissions from a 1992 Tier 0 5.2L van were evaluated after 3hr, 12hr, and 24hr soak periods. After a 12hr soak the HC emissions were reduced by about 55% over the baseline HC emissions; after a 24hr soak the device did not exhibit any benefit in light-off compared to a conventional converter. Cool-down characteristics of this VICC indicated that the catalyst mid-bed temperature was about 180°C after 24hrs. Model calculations of the temperature warm-up were conducted on a VICC converter. Different warm-up profiles within the converter were predicted depending on the initial temperature of the device.