Search Results

The automotive industry continues to increase the utilization of computer-aided engineering. This put demands on finding reliable objective measures that correlate to subjective driver assessments on driving stability performance. However, the drivers’ subjective perception of driving stability can be difficult to quantify objectively, especially on test tracks where the wind conditions cannot be controlled. The advancement in driving simulator technology may enable evaluation of driving stability with high repeatability. The purpose of this study is to correlate the subjective assessment of driving stability to reliable objective measures and to evaluate the usefulness of a driving simulator for the subjective assessment. Two different driver clinic studies were performed in a state-of-the-art driving simulator. The first study included 38 drivers (professional, experienced and common drivers) and focused on crosswind gust sensitivity.

The automotive trends of vehicles with lower aerodynamic drag and more powerful drivetrains have caused increasing concern regarding stability issues at high speeds, since more streamlined bodies show greater sensitivity to crosswinds. This is especially pronounced for high vehicles, such as sports utility vehicles. Besides, the competitiveness in the automotive industry requires faster development times and, thus, a need to evaluate the high speed stability performance in an early design phase, preferable using simulation tools. The usefulness of these simulation tools partly relies on realistic boundary conditions for the wind and quantitative measures for assessing stability without the subjective evaluation of experienced drivers. This study employs an on-road experimental measurements setup to define relevant wind conditions and to find an objective methodology to evaluate high speed stability.