Refine Your Search

Search Results

Viewing 1 to 3 of 3
Technical Paper

Empirically Based Water Condensation and Vapor Clearing Time Calculator for Automotive Lighting Assemblies

2008-04-14
2008-01-0489
Drawing from previous studies published in SAE, a software program describes physical progress of water intrusion into or released from a lamp assembly. This program, based on test data, calculates condensation quantity and clearing time. It calculates moisture exchange between a lamp assembly and ambient, considering the moisture contained in the air inside of the lamp and moisture stored on the wall surface or in the materials. This program is applicable to different scenarios, such as initial humidity conditions of a lamp assembly, lamp size, type, venting type and test performance specifications. The significance of the program application in guiding test performance will also be addressed.
Technical Paper

Understanding Water Vapor Gradients Conducive to Condensation in an Automotive Lamp

2005-04-11
2005-01-1448
Certain conditions promote water vapor to condense on available surfaces within an automotive lighting assembly. Certain surfaces are more susceptible to water condensation than others. This is due partially to temperature gradients in the lamp and possibly water vapor concentration gradients. This study demonstrates that humidity gradients exist in an automotive lamp. How humidity gradients affect the likelihood of surface condensation for a particular interior surface of a lamp will also be addressed.
Technical Paper

The Effect of Environmental Conditions on Moisture Clearing Time in Automotive Lamps

2003-03-03
2003-01-0646
The FMVSS humidity test, as described in 571.108 S8.7, for forward automotive lamps permits environmental conditions to vary within a given tolerance. Pre-soak conditions of the lamp for the test may vary. The tolerances during the soak portion of the test allow for a +4°C variation (from the initial 38°C environment) and a +10% variation from the initial 90% environment relative humidity. Tolerances during the wind portion of the test allow for a +4°C variation (from the initial 23°C environment), a +10% variation from the initial 30% environment relative humidity, and a -0.153 m/s (-30 ft/min) variation from the initial 1.68 m/s (330 ft/min) airspeed setting. Utilizing a climate control wind tunnel, this study demonstrates that the tolerances on the environmental test conditions will produce substantial test result variation. The discussion emphasizes the best environmental condition to minimize time to clear condensation for a particular automotive lamp.
X