Search Results

The use of commercial finite element analysis (FEA) software to perform stamping feasibility studies of automotive components has grown extensively over the last decade. Although product and process engineers have now come to rely heavily on results from FEA simulation for manufacturability of components, the prediction of springback has still not been perfected. Springback prediction for simple geometries is found to be quite accurate while springback prediction in complex components fails to compare with experimental results. Since most forming simulation FEA software uses a dynamic explicit solution method, the choice of various input parameters greatly affects the prediction of post formed stresses in the final component. Accurate stress prediction is critical for determination of springback, therefore this study focuses on the effects of some of the simulation parameters such as, element size, tool/loading speed and loading profile.

Tubular hydroforming is a novel process that has recently gained much attention due to its cost-effective application in the automotive industry. Hydroformed automotive parts have high strength to weight ratio and have good repeatability with high dimensional accuracy. At this time, there is little experience in modeling the hydroforming process to better understand its application and researchers have tried using stamping simulation software to analyze the process. Unlike conventional sheet stamping which is a displacement driven process, tubular hydroforming is a force driven process and its success is governed by the nature of internal pressurization. Hence, a new three-dimensional finite element model using a computationally efficient 6-noded shell element has been developed. A simple pressure prediction model has been developed and integrated into the formulation for effective control of the process.