Search Results

One of the primary correlates to customer annoyance with door-closing sound is peak loudness. In addition, customer annoyance also increases with the existence of secondary impacts, such as rattles. While these secondary impacts are typically not seen in the time-varying loudness trace (or other common sound quality metrics), it is often possible to visually identify the impacts in a time-frequency display of the door-closing sound. But the reduction of this display information to a single-number objective metric that agrees with subjective assessments has previously proved elusive. This paper summarizes the recent development and application of an objective metric that agrees with subjective classifications of secondary impacts in door-closing sounds.

Impact harshness characterizes interior sound and vibration resulting from tire interactions with discrete road disturbances. Typical interactions are expansion joints, railroad crossings, and other road discontinuities at low-to-medium vehicle speeds. One goal of the current study was to validate for light trucks and SUVs the metric that was developed for cars: a weighted combination of peak loudness values from the front and rear impacts after lowpass filtering at 1 kHz. Another goal was to see if other sound characteristics of impact harshness needed to be captured with a metric. A listening study was conducted with participants evaluating several different trucks and SUVs for impact harshness. Results show that the existing metric correlates well with subjective preferences for most of the vehicles.