Search Results

The increasing importance of minimizing drag and the absence of an exhaust system result in battery electric vehicles (BEVs) commonly having a very streamlined underbody. Although this shape of underbody is typically characterized by a low acoustic interference potential, significant flow resonance can be observed for certain vehicle configurations and frequencies below 30 Hz. Since the interior of the vehicle can be excited as a Helmholtz resonator, these low-frequency fluctuations result in reduced comfort for the passengers. As preliminary studies have shown, the flow around the front wheel spoilers significantly influences this flow phenomenon. Flow separation occurs at the front-wheel spoilers and at the front wheels. This leads to the generation of vortices which are growing significantly while being transported downstream with the flow. Even small geometric changes to add-on components on the underbody significantly influence both aerodynamics and aeroacoustics.

A computational study of the vehicle aerodynamics influenced by the wake of the rotating wheel taking into account a detailed rim geometry is presently performed. The car configuration corresponds to a full-scale (1:1) notchback configuration of the well-known ‘DrivAer’ vehicle model, Heft et al. [1]. The objective of the present work is to investigate the performance of some popular turbulence models in conjunction with different methods for handling the wheel rotation – rotating wall velocity, ‘multiple reference frame’ and ‘sliding grid algorithm’. The specific focus hereby is on a near-wall RANS eddy-viscosity model based on elliptic-relaxation, sensitized to resolve fluctuating turbulence by introducing a specifically modeled production term in the scale-supplying equation, motivated by the Scale-Adaptive Simulation approach (SAS, [2]), proposed by Krumbein et al. [3].

Automotive engineers use the wind tunnel to improve a vehicle’s aerodynamic properties on the road. However, a car driving on the road does not experience the steady-state, uniform flow characteristic of the wind tunnel. Wind, terrain and traffic all cause the flow experienced by the vehicle to be highly transient. Therefore, it is imperative to understand the effects of forces acting on the vehicle resulting from unsteady flow. To this end, the FKFS swing® installed in the University of Stuttgart’s model scale wind tunnel was used to create 36 different incident flow signals with time-resolved yaw angles. The cD values of five different 25% vehicle models, each with a notchback and a squareback configuration, were measured while under the influence of the aforementioned signals. The vehicle models were chosen to ensure a variety of different geometries, but at the same time also to enable isolated comparison of specific geometric properties.

Typical automotive research in wind tunnels is conducted under idealized, stationary, low turbulence flow conditions. This does not necessarily reflect the actual situation in traffic. Thus, there is a considerable interest to simulate the actual flow conditions. Because of this, a system for the simulation of the turbulence intensity I, the integral linear scale L and the transient angle of incidence β measured in full-scale tests in the inflow of a test vehicle was developed and installed in a closed-loop, closed test section wind tunnel. The system consists of four airfoils with movable flaps and is installed in the beginning of the test section. Time-series of the flow velocity vector are measured in the empty test section to analyze the system’s envelope in terms of the turbulence intensity and the integral length scales.

Cooling drag is the increase in the total drag due to the internal flow in the cooling system. Because of the high flow resistance in the heat exchanger the momentum of the fluid needed for engine cooling usually is dissipated nearly completely. The resulting drag penalty can be approximated by the so called ram drag. For ground vehicles the cooling drag is typically lower than this approximation due to positive interference of the cooling flow with the general flow around the vehicle. Different mechanisms for the positive interference have been described in the literature. Inlet interference as well as outlet interference can result in significant reduction of the share of the cooling drag. Positive outlet interference is obtained, when the remaining kinetic energy of the cooling flow contributes significant thrust to the overall momentum balance.

For the aerodynamic development of an aircraft the induced drag is an important quantity and it has a significant impact on the design of the wing. The induced drag corresponds to the power requirement of the wing to generate the necessary lift. In many cases this is the dominant source of drag for aircraft. In ground vehicle aerodynamics the concept of induced drag up to now has attracted much less attention. This is partly due to the fact, that vehicle aerodynamicists usually optimize the vehicles to generate little or no lift. The second reason is that it is much more difficult for a ground vehicle to separate the total drag into the different contributions. During wind tunnel tests of vehicles with and without ground simulation some astonishing results were found, especially when comparing results for different rear end shapes.