Search Results

Described in this paper is a component test methodology to evaluate the door trim armrest performance in an Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) side impact test and to predict the SID-IIs abdomen injury metrics (rib deflection, deflection rate and V*C). The test methodology consisted of a sub-assembly of two SID-IIs abdomen ribs with spine box, mounted on a linear bearing and allowed to translate in the direction of impact. The spine box with the assembly of two abdominal ribs was rigidly attached to the sliding test fixture, and is stationary at the start of the test. The door trim armrest was mounted on the impactor, which was prescribed the door velocity profile obtained from full-vehicle test. The location and orientation of the armrest relative to the dummy abdomen ribs was maintained the same as in the full-vehicle test.

Numerical analyses frequently accompany experimental investigations that study injury biomechanics and improvements in automotive safety. Limited by computational speed, earlier mathematical models tended to simplify the system under study so that a set of differential equations could be written and solved. Advances in computing technology and analysis software have enabled the development of many sophisticated models that have the potential to provide a more comprehensive understanding of human impact response, injury mechanisms, and tolerance. In this article, 50 years of publications on numerical modeling published in the Stapp Car Crash Conference Proceedings and Journal were reviewed. These models were based on: (a) author-developed equations and software, (b) public and commercially available programs to solve rigid body dynamic models (such as MVMA2D, CAL3D or ATB, and MADYMO), and (c) finite element models.

The ability to extract and evaluate the time history of structural deformations or crush during vehicle crashes represents a significant challenge to automotive safety researchers. Current methods are limited by the use of electro-mechanical devices such as string pots and/or linear variable displacement transducers (LVDT). Typically, one end of the transducer must be mounted to a point on the structure that will remain un-deformed during the event; the other end is then attached to the point on the structure where the deformation is to be measured. This approach measures the change in distance between these two points and is unable to resolve any movement into its respective X, Y, or Z directions. Also, the accuracy of electro-mechanical transducers is limited by their dynamic response to crash conditions. The photogrammetry technique has been used successfully in a wide variety of applications including aerial surveying, civil engineering and documentation of traffic accidents.

State of the art electronic restraint systems rely on the acceleration measured during a vehicle crash for deployment decisions. The acceleration signal is analyzed with different criteria, among which the velocity change is a dominant criterion in almost any existing crash detection algorithm. Sensors in the front crush zone have recently been added to help develop restraint systems that comply with the new FMVSS208 and EuroNCAP regulations. Front crash sensors are usually evaluated for their velocity change during a crash and typically play a key role in the deployment decision. CAE based FEA analysis has recently been used to generate signals at the sensor module locations in crash simulations to provide supplemental information for crash sensing algorithm development and calibration. This paper presents an initial effort in developing a velocity-based crash detection algorithm, that allows broad use of CAE generated velocity time histories for system calibration.

Head Impact Criterion (HIC) numbers obtained from interior head impact testing with the NHTSA-designed Free Motion Headform (FMH) are influenced by many variables. The high level of variability experienced in the NHTSA-proposed Interior Head Impact Test presents a challenge to today's automotive engineers. Primary contributors to HIC variability include (1) impact speed, (2) headform calibration performance, (3) design/build part variation, and (4) target point impact accuracy. This study shows that controlling these variables during testing can improve test data repeatability and reproducibility, as well as reduce design and testing time.