Search Results

A variety of structures resonate when they are excited by external forces at, or near, their natural frequencies. This can lead to high deformation which may cause damage to the integrity of the structure. There have been many applications of external devices to dampen the effects of this excitation, such as tuned mass dampers or both semi-active and active dampers, which have been implemented in buildings, bridges, and other large structures. One of the active cancellation methods uses centrifugal forces generated by the rotation of an unbalanced mass. These forces help to counter the external excitation force coming into the structure. This research focuses on active force cancellation using centrifugal forces (CFG) due to mass imbalance and provides a virtual solution to simulate and predict the forces required to cancel external excitation to an automotive structure. This research tries to address the challenges to miniaturize the CFG model for a body-on-frame truck.

This paper delves into the investigation of flatness-based active damping control for hybrid vehicle transmissions. The main objective is to improve the current in-production controller performances without the need for additional sensors or observers. The primary goals include improving torque setpoint tracking, enhancing robustness margins, and ensuring zero steady-state torque correction. The investigation proceeds in several steps: Initially, both the general differential flatness property and the identification of flat outputs in linear dynamical systems are revisited. Subsequently, the bond graph formalism is employed to deduce straightforwardly the dynamical equations of the system. Next, a new flat output of the vehicle transmission is identified and utilized to formulate the trajectory tracking controller to align with the required control objectives and to fulfill the system constraints.

Engine stall, a noteworthy occurrence in traditional vehicles, poses challenges due to the inability to disconnect the engine from the driveline. Consequently, in such scenarios, the vehicle experiences a loss of propulsion, necessitating the driver to pull over. The severity of propulsion loss events is underscored by regulatory bodies like the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), potentially leading to costly recalls for Automotive Manufacturers. Therefore, proactive measures to avert Loss of Propulsion (LoP) events, including the exploration of remedial actions, are strongly encouraged during powertrain controls design. In contrast, hybrid electric vehicles offer a unique advantage. Given the ability to connect or disconnect the engine from the driveline in hybrid or electric-only modes, an engine stall in hybrid mode need not result in a complete loss of propulsion.

With the proliferation of electric vehicles in the market, it has become important for Automotive OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers) to focus on delivering a higher driving range while also maximizing performance. One approach OEMs are actively considering in meeting this goal is to include a secondary drive axle disconnect into the powertrain which has the potential to improve the overall driving range by about 6-8.3% [4]. This paper outlines the need for a novel controls architecture to make the Powertrain controls software modular and to reduce the development time needed to provide robust powertrain control software. To do this, the electrified powertrain torque controls at STELLANTIS NV takes a decentralized controls architecture approach, by separating the axle disconnect controls subsystem (ADCS) from the primary path of torque controls. The ADCS takes in information such as the desired axle state and controls the axle disconnect actuators to achieve that state.

Many chassis and powertrain components in the transportation and automotive industry experience multi-axial cyclic service loading. A thorough load-history leading to durability damage should be considered in the early vehicle production steps. The key feature of rubber fatigue analysis discussed in this study is how to define local critical location strain time history based on nominal and complex load time histories. Material coupon characterization used here is the crack growth approach, based on fracture mechanics parameters. This methodology was utilized and presented for a truck engine mount. Temperature effects are not considered since proving ground (PG) loads are generated under isothermal high temperature and low frequency conditions without high amounts of self-heating.

Vibration shaker testing is a great tool of validating the vibration fatigue performance of automotive components & systems. However, the representative vibration schedule requires a pre-knowledge of the acceleration history for the test object, which usually is not available until the later development phase of a vehicle program when physical properties are available. Sometimes, a generic vibration schedule developed from the worst-case loading profiles are used with risk of lacking correlation with later full vehicle durability test such as Road Test Simulator (RTS) or Proving Ground (PG) road test due to the higher loading amplitude. This paper proposes a virtual accelerometer approach to collect acceleration responses of a component from a virtual vehicle model. First, a multiple body dynamic model will be produced for virtual load calculation over a series of digitalized virtual proving ground road profiles.

The Brake judder is a low-level vibration caused due to Disc Thickness Variation (DTV), Temperature, Brake Torque Variation (BTV), thermal degradation, hotspot etc. which is a major concern for the past decades in automobile manufacturers. To predict the judder performance, the modelling methods are proposed in terms of frequency and BTV respectively. In this study, a mathematical model is constructed by considering full brake assembly, tie rod, coupling rod, steering column, and steering wheel as a spring mass system for identifying judder frequency. Simulation is also performed to predict the occurrence of brake judder and those results are validated with theoretical results. Similarly, for calculating BTV a separate methodology is proposed in CAE and validated with experimental and theoretical results.

Cooling airflow is an essential factor when it comes to vehicle performance and operating safety. In recent years, significant efforts have been made to maximize the flow efficiency through the heat exchangers in the under-hood compartment. Grille shutters, new fan shapes, better sealings are only some examples of innovations in this field of work. Underhood cooling airflow simulations are an integral part of the vehicle development process. Especially in the early development phase, where no test data is available to verify the cooling performance of the vehicle, computational fluid dynamics simulations (CFD) can be a valuable tool to identify the lack of fan performance and to develop the appropriate strategy to achieve airflow goals through the heat exchangers. For vehicles with heat exchangers in the underhood section the airflow through those components is of particular interest.

ISO/SAE 21434 [1] Final International Standard was released September 2021 to great fanfare and is the most prominent standard in Automotive Cybersecurity. As members of the Joint Working Group (JWG) the authors spent 5 years developing the 84 pages of precise wording acceptable to hundreds of contributors. At the same time the auto industry had been undergoing a metamorphosis probably unmatched in its hundred-year history. A centerpiece of the metamorphosis is the adoption of the Agile development method to meet market demands for time-to-market and flexibility of design. Unfortunately, a strategic decision was made by the JWG to focus ISO/SAE 21434 on the V-Model method. Agile does not break ISO/SAE 21434. Agile is a framework that can be adapted to suit any process. In the end the goals are the same regardless of development method; security by design must be achieved.

In the light duty diesel segment, the need persists for an advanced control system to monitor the health of an aftertreatment system throughout a vehicle’s life in order to maintain compliance with ever tightening emissions levels. In on-board diagnostics (OBD), every diagnostic is validated during development stages to detect when a system under monitoring of that diagnostic has failed. This necessitates the need to create parts which represent a failure that would be observed on the vehicle. These failed parts, referred to as limit or threshold parts, are developed through a limit part creation process. Although there are commonalities amongst Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM), each OEM has their own detection logic which will require a unique and specific limit part. Various methods exist for creating these limit parts, and each method produces a different combination of ability to detect the failure and its associated tailpipe emissions.

Accurate prediction of in-vehicle powertrain bounce mode is necessary to ensure optimum responses are achieved at driver’s touch points during 4post shake or rough road shake events. But, during the early stages of vehicle development, building a detailed vehicle finite element (FE) model is not possible and often powertrain bounce modes are computed assuming the powertrain to be a stand-alone unit. Studies conducted on FE models of a large SUV with body on frame architecture showed that the stand-alone approach overestimates the powertrain bounce mode. Consequently, there is a need for a simplified version of vehicle model which can be built early on to compute powertrain modes. Previously, representing all the major components as rigid entities, simplified unibody vehicle models have been built to compute powertrain modes. But such an approach would be inaccurate here, for a vehicle with body on frame architecture due to the flexible nature of the frame (even at low frequencies).

As the move to decrease physical prototyping increases the need to virtually prototype vehicles become more critical. Assessing NVH vehicle targets and making critical component level decisions is becoming a larger part of the NVH engineer’s job. To make decisions earlier in the process when prototypes are not available companies need to leverage more both their historical and simulation results. Today this is possible by utilizing a hybrid modelling approach in an NVH Simulator using measured on road, CAE, and test bench data. By starting with measured on road data from a previous generation or comparable vehicle, engineers can build virtual prototypes by using a hybrid modeling approach incorporating CAE and/or test bench data to create the desired NVH characteristics. This enables the creation of a virtual drivable model to assess subjectively the vehicles acoustic targets virtually before a prototype vehicle is available.

Euro NCAP committee has created the Mobile Progressive Deformable Barrier (MPDB) “Compatibility” test that could change the way we design the vehicle front structure for impact [4]. To assist the crashworthy design development activity for this new mode of impact test, CAE barrier models [2] have been developed and used by vehicle safety CAE engineers. These impact models are designed to generate the barrier deformation data essential for evaluation of the scores of the two rating parameters of “Standard Deviation”, “Bottom-Out” for the MPDB impact event. In test, a physical 3-D scanner measures the barrier deformation depth and draws contour plot necessary for determining above two rating parameters. For model results assessment, a virtual scanner, which can emulate the measurement accuracy of the physical scanner is required.

In this study we collect and analyze data on how hands-free automated lane centering systems affect the controllability of a hazardous event during an operational situation by a human operator. Through these data and their analysis, we seek to answer the following questions: Is Level 2 and Level 3 automated driving inherently uncontrollable as a result of a steering failure? Or, is there some level of operator control of hazardous situations occurring during Level 2 and Level 3 automated driving that can reasonably be expected, given that these systems still rely on a driver as the primary fall back. The controllability focus group experiments were carried out using an instrumented MY15 Jeep® Cherokee with a prototype Level 2 automated driving system that was modified to simulate a hands-free steering system on a closed track with speeds up to 110kph. The vehicle was also fitted with supplemental safety measures to ensure experimenter control.

The complexities involved in an optimization problem at a system level require knowledge base that has information on different approaches and customization of these approaches to a specific class of the optimization problems. One approach that is commonly used is the metamodel based design optimization. The metamodel is 1) a conceptual model for capturing, in abstract terms, essential characteristics of a given optimization problem, and 2) a schema of sufficient formality to enable the problem modeled to be serialized to statements in a concrete optimization language [1]. Optimization is performed based on this metamodel. This metamodel approach has been proven effective and accurate in providing the global optimum. Depending upon the computational hardware availability in an organization, the metamodel based optimization could be much faster way of achieving the optimized solution. However, the accuracy of the optimization is highly dependent on the quality of metamodel generated.

For the designing of world class vehicles, ride comfort is one of the criteria that vehicle manufacturers are constantly trying to improve. The automotive seating system is an important sub-system in a vehicle that contributes to the ride comfort of the vehicle occupants. Seat vibrations are perceived by the occupants and make them feel uncomfortable during driving conditions. These vibrations are majorly transferred from engine and road excitation loads. For road excitation loads, the road testing may not be accurately repeatable, and measurements based on four post shakers are used to assess the discomfort. The major challenges for the vehicle manufactures is the availability of physical prototypes at an early stage of vehicle development and any changes in the design due to test validation leads to huge cost and time.

The reduction of automotive emissions is instrumental in the fight against air pollution and its impact on global warming. This realization has empowered governments around the world to mandate lower levels of vehicle emissions requiring the Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) to implement advanced aftertreatment technologies in their applications. Achieving emission levels as low as SULEV30 or SULEV20 would have been impossible only a couple of decades ago, however, these lower levels of emissions are now a possibility through advanced control strategies and aftertreatment systems. As a part of this mandate to lower emissions, OEMs are also continuously monitoring the health and performance of their aftertreatment and control components. The implementation of On Board Diagnostics (OBD) ensures that control systems are functioning robustly and the emission levels are achieved and maintained to high mileages for the life of the vehicle.

In response to demands for higher fuel economy and stringent emission regulations, OEMs always strive hard to improve component/system efficiency and minimize losses. In the driveline system, improving the efficiency of an automotive rear-axle is critical because it is one of the major power-loss contributor. Optimum oil-fill inside an axle is one of the feasible solutions to minimize spin losses, while ensuring lubrication performance and heat-dissipation requirements. Thus, prior to conducting vehicle development tests, several dyno-level tests are conducted to study the thermal behavior of axle-oil (optimum level) under severe operating conditions. These test conditions represent the axle operation in hot weather conditions, steep grade, maximum tow capacity, etc. It is important to ensure that oil does not exceed its thermal limits (disintegration of oil leading to degradation).

Vehicle suspension parts are subjected to variable road loads, manufacturing process variation and high installation loads in assembly process. Seam welding can be considered as such process to connect more components and parts. Typical in a Mc Pherson suspension system stabilizer bar link is connected to the strut assembly through ball stud and clamped to a bracket welded to the outer strut tube. Cracks have been observed in the stabilizer bar link bracket welds of vehicles in the field, effecting the functionality of the suspension system. During preliminary phase of product development CAE assessment of the seam weld is carried out against road load data, if the design does not meet the targets enabler studies are carried out in an iterative approach. Various design variables (control factors) can be considered to carry out the iterations.

Vibrations affect vehicle occupants and should be prevented early in design process. Powertrain (PT) wiggle is one of the well-known issues. It is the 3rd order lateral vibration, forced by half shaft inner LH/RH plunging tripod joints [1,2]. Lateral PT resonance (7-15Hz) occurs at certain vehicle speed during acceleration and may excite lateral, pitch and roll PT modes. Typically, PT wiggle occurs in speed range of 5-25kph. Vibration is noticeable on driver and passenger seats mostly in lateral direction. The inner half shaft joints are the major source of vibration. Unfortunately, existing MBD tools like Adams [3] are missing detailed tripod joint representation because of complex mechanical interactions inside the joint. At least three sliding contacts between tripod rollers and joint housing, lubricant inside the can and combination of rotation and plunging make the modeling too complicated.