Search Results

Innovations in mobility are built upon a management of complex interactions between sub-systems and components. A need for CAE tools that are capable of system simulations is well recognized, as evidenced by a growing number of commercial packages. However impressive they are, the predictability of such simulations still rests on the representation of the base components. Among them, a wet clutch actuator continues to play a critical role in the next generation propulsion systems. It converts hydraulic pressure to mechanical force to control torque transmitted through a clutch pack. The actuator is typically modeled as a hydraulic piston opposed by a mechanical spring. Because the piston slides over a seal, some models have a framework to account for seal friction. However, there are few contributions to the literature that describe the effects of seals on clutch actuator behaviors.

Simulations conducted on-board in a vehicle control module can offer valuable information to control strategies. Continued improvements to on-board computing hardware make online simulations of complex dynamic systems such as drivetrains within reach. This capability enables predictions of the system response to various control actions and disturbances. Implementation of online simulations requires model initialization that is consistent with the physical drivetrain state. However, sensor signals and estimated variables are susceptible to errors, compromising the accuracy of the initialization and any future state predictions as the simulation proceeds through the numerical integration process. This paper describes a drivetrain modeling and analysis method that accounts for initialization errors, thereby enabling accurate simulations of system behaviors.

A wet friction component continues to play a critical role in a step-ratio automatic transmission (AT) system. It is hydraulically actuated to alter planetary gear configurations for automatic shifting. During a shift event, its engagement torque is transmitted to AT output shaft, directly affecting vehicle shift quality. The friction component behaviors vary widely under different conditions. In a vehicle development process, unanticipated behaviors often lead to an inefficient trial-and-error approach for adjusting shift feel. Thus, a shift improvement process can benefit from upfront characterization of friction component behaviors. The so-called SAE#2 test system has served as the industry-standard since 1960's for evaluating friction components. It provides a useful means for evaluating friction component design variables. However, its standardized test conditions do not adequately capture dynamic effects of AT shift control variables.