Search Results

Automated driving systems (ADS) are one of the key modern technologies that are changing the way we perceive mobility and transportation. In addition to providing significant access to mobility, they can also be useful in decreasing the number of road accidents. For these benefits to be realized, candidate ADS need to be proven as safe, robust, and reliable; both by design and in the performance of navigating their operational design domain (ODD). This paper proposes a multi-pronged approach to evaluate the safety performance of a hypothetical candidate system. Safety performance is assessed through using a set of test cases/scenarios that provide substantial coverage of those potentially encountered in an ODD. This systematic process is used to create a library of scenarios, specific to a defined domain. Beginning with a system-specific ODD definition, a set of core competencies are identified.

Automated Driving Systems (ADS) make the driving experience safer, more efficient, and comfortable by performing complex maneuvers, preempting potential risky situations, or taking over the driver’s tasks in critical situations. Innovation acceptance research for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) illustrates the increasing demand for safety and comfort as the two prime movers of the ADAS market. Since ADAS technologies have significant impact on human lives, extensive testing and validation throughout the design process is indispensable. Due to complexity of systems, cost of testing, and safety of test engineers, a significant chunk of ADAS calibration and validation needs to be done virtually. Although simulation-based verification and validation (V&V) is not new, the test descriptions, modeling and simulation framework are not yet well established. Off-the-shelf software tools have different architectures, simulation procedures, data standardizations, and tradeoffs.