Search Results

Often, when assessing the distraction or ease of use of an in-vehicle task (such as entering a destination using the street address method), the first question is “How long does the task take on average?” Engineers routinely resolve this question using computational models. For in-vehicle tasks, “how long” is estimated by summing times for the included task elements (e.g., decide what to do, press a button) from SAE Recommended Practice J2365 or now using new static (while parked) data presented here. Times for the occlusion conditions in J2365 and the NHTSA Distraction Guidelines can be determined using static data and Pettitt’s Method or Purucker’s Method. These first approximations are reasonable and can be determined quickly. The next question usually is “How likely is it that the task will exceed some limit?”

Making manned and remotely-controlled wheeled and tracked vehicles easier to drive, especially off-road, is of great interest to the U.S. Army. If vehicles are easier to drive (especially closed hatch) or if they are driven autonomously, then drivers could perform additional tasks (e.g., operating weapons or communication systems), leading to reduced crew sizes. Further, poorly driven vehicles are more likely to get stuck, roll over, or encounter mines or improvised explosive devices, whereby the vehicle can no longer perform its mission and crew member safety is jeopardized. HMI technology and systems to support human drivers (e.g., autonomous driving systems, in-vehicle monitors or head-mounted displays, various control devices (including game controllers), navigation and route-planning systems) need to be evaluated, which traditionally occurs in mission-specific (and incomparable) evaluations.

As new technology is added to vehicles and traffic congestion increases, there is a concern that drivers will be overloaded. As a result, there has been considerable interest in measuring driver workload. This can be achieved using many methods, with subjective assessments such as the NASA Task Loading Index (TLX) being most popular. Unfortunately, the TLX is unanchored, so there is no way to compare TLX values between studies, thus limiting the value of those evaluations. In response, a method was created to anchor overall workload ratings. To develop this method, 24 subjects rated the workload of clips of forward scenes collected while driving on rural, urban, and limited-access roads in relation to 2 looped anchor clips. Those clips corresponded to Level of Service (LOS) A and E (light and heavy traffic) and were assigned values of 2 and 6 respectively.