Search Results

Many dual fuel technologies have been proposed for diesel engines. Implementing dual fuel modes can lead to emissions reductions or increased efficiency through using partially premixed combustion and fuel reactivity control. All dual fuel systems have the practical disadvantage that a secondary fuel storage and delivery system must be included. Reforming the primary diesel to a less reactive vaporized fuel on-board has potential to overcome this key disadvantage. Most previous research regarding on-board fuel reforming has been focused on producing significant quantities of hydrogen. However, only partially reforming the primary fuel is sufficient to vaporize and create a less volatile fuel that can be fumigated into an engine intake. At lower conversion efficiency and higher equivalence ratio, reforming reactors retain higher percentage of the inlet fuel’s heating value thus allowing for greater overall engine system efficiency.

The impact of compression ratio on engine efficiency is well known. A plethora of mechanical concepts have been proposed for altering engine compression ratio in real time. Some of these, like free-piston configurations or complex crank-slider mechanisms have the added ability to alter piston trajectory along with compression ratio. This secondary modality raises the question: Is there a more optimal piston position versus crank-angle profile for spark-ignition (SI) engines than the near-sinusoidal motion produced by a traditional four-bar crank-slider mechanism? Very little published literature directly addresses this question. This work presents the results of a quasi-dimensional SI engine model using piston trajectory as an input. Specific trajectory traits including increased dwell at top dead center and asymmetric compression and expansion strokes were swept. The trajectory also was optimized using a single objective genetic algorithm with 60 individuals and 40 generations.