Search Results

Reliably calibrated simulation and combustion models not only enable the prediction of non-validated operating points, but also compensate for the time that would be required for costly test bench measurements. Under the premise of investigating various turbocharging concepts for a combustion engine without the need for recalibration, the present work will discuss the influence of two different exhaust gas turbocharger systems on model calibration. Replacing turbochargers is a practical way to test the predictive performance of simulations, since they can drastically affect and change the thermodynamic boundary conditions for comparable operating points. On the one hand, the choice of the appropriate calibration strategy and, on the other hand, the interchangeability of the respective calibration will be discussed.

Synthetic fuels for internal combustion engines offer CO2-neutral mobility if produced in a closed carbon cycle using renewable energies. C1-based synthetic fuels can offer high knock resistance as well as soot free combustion due to their molecular structure containing oxygen and no direct C-C bonds. Such fuels as, for example, dimethyl carbonate (DMC) and methyl formate (MeFo) have great potential to replace gasoline in spark-ignition (SI) engines. In this study, a mixture of 65% DMC and 35% MeFo (C65F35) was used in a single-cylinder research engine to determine friction losses in the piston group using the floating-liner method. The results were benchmarked against gasoline (G100). Compared to gasoline, the density of C65F35 is almost 40% higher, but its mass-based lower heating value (LHV) is 2.8 times lower. Hence, more fuel must be injected to reach the same engine load as in a conventional gasoline engine, leading to an increased cooling effect.