Search Results

With the introduction of EU6d and CN6 all vehicles with gasoline direct injection and many with port fuel injection engine will be equipped with a gasoline particulate filter (GPF). A range of first generation filter technologies has been introduced successfully, helping to significantly reduce the tailpipe particulate number emissions. The continued focus on particulate emissions and the increasing understanding of their impact on human health, combined with the advanced emission regulations under RDE conditions results in the desire for filters with even higher filtration efficiency, especially in the totally fresh state. At the same time, to balance with the requirements on power and CO2, limitations exist with respect to the tolerable pressure drop of filters. In this paper we will report on a new generation of gasoline particulate filters for uncatalyzed applications.

RDE test has been introduced to the light-duty vehicle certification process in both China 6 and Euro 6d standards. The RDE test shall be performed on-road with PEMS, which is developed to complement the current laboratory certification of vehicles and ensure cars to deliver low emissions under more realistic on-road driving conditions. Particulate matter has been highly perceived as a significant contributor to human health risks and thus strictly regulated globally. For the RDE evaluation, the MAW method used by the China 6 standard is usually found less stringent than the RMA method used by the Euro 6d standard. In the present study, both of the MAW and RMA methods were applied to different driving cycles and operating conditions, which met the general RDE test requirements, yet resulted in different evaluated PN results.

The ceramic wall-flow filter has now been globally commercialized for aftertreatment systems in light-duty gasoline engine powered vehicles. This technology, known as the gasoline particulate filter (GPF), represents a durable solution for particulate emissions control. The goal of this study was to track the evolution of tailpipe particulate and gaseous emissions of a 4-cylinder gasoline turbocharged direct injected (GTDI) 2018 North American (NA) mild-hybrid light-duty SUV, from a fresh state to the 4,000-mile, EPA certification mileage level. For this purpose, a production TWC + GPF aftertreatment system designed for a China 6b-compliant variant of this test vehicle was retrofitted in place of the North American Tier 3 Bin 85 TWC-only system. Chassis dyno emissions testing was performed at predetermined mileage points with real-world, on-road driving conducted for the necessary mileage accumulation.

As the China 6 light duty vehicle emission regulation is being implemented, PN becomes a challenge for vehicle type-approval emission tests. WLTC has replaced NEDC as the Type-I test cycle on the chassis dynamometer with more dynamic driving events. In addition, on-road RDE test is a challenge to calibrate the engine to meet tailpipe PN emissions because of the nature of the on-road conditions, i.e. varying ambient temperature, driving dynamics, altitude, etc. In response to China 6 requirements, GPF technology has been introduced. In this study, we pulled four China 6 compliant gasoline vehicles for the PN emission survey. The selected vehicles covered typical engine technologies including GDI/MPI with natural aspiration/turbo charger, representing the state of the art of the local engine capability. On one hand, it helps to build insight into the status of China 6 engine emission control technology through WLTC and RTS95 tests.

For more than two decades [1,2], Corning has served the community with an annual review of global regulatory and technological advances pertaining to emissions from internal combustion engine (ICE) driven vehicles and machinery. We continue with a review for the year 2020, which will be remembered by COVID and the significant negative impact it had on the industry. However, it also provided a glimpse of the possible improvement in air quality with reduced anthropogenic emissions. It was a year marked by goals set for climate change mitigation via reduced fossil fuel use by the transportation sector. Governments stepped up plans to accelerate the adoption of zero tailpipe emitting vehicles. However, any transformation of the transportation sector is not going to happen overnight due to the scale of the infrastructure and technology challenges. A case in point is China, which announced a technology roadmap which envisions half of the vehicles to be hybrids in 2035.

Accelerated ash loading studies provide a cost-effective means of investigating the long-term impacts of ash accumulation in diesel particulate filters (DPFs). Despite a variety of methods adopted in previous studies for accelerated ash loading, evaluation of their impact on DPF behavior has been limited primarily to pressure drop response (with & without soot), and characterization of properties of the resulting ash deposits for comparison with samples from field testing. In the current study, the potential to use ash recovered from field DPFs to perform accelerated ash loading studies is explored. Additionally, anhydrous gypsum as a surrogate for diesel ash was investigated. Benefits of using gypsum include low cost and easy access, safety during handling and testing, and consistency from test to test. Narrow control of particle sizing and composition can help compare performance over a wide range of filter sizes and applications.

As the official proposal for emission regulation Euro 7 has been released by European Commission, PN above 10nm is taken into consideration for the ultrafine particulate emissions control. The challenges of GPF filtration efficiency emerge for the light-duty manufactures to meet the future emission standards. In the present study, a China 6 compliant vehicle was tested to reveal its performance over the China 6 standards and potential to meet the upcoming Euro 7. Three GPF product types (Gen 1, Gen 2, and concept Gen 3) were mounted to the tested vehicle. WLTC tests were conducted on chassis dynamometer in laboratory as well as a self-designed aggressive cycle (“Base Cycle”) tests. To explore the GPFs performance for PN emissions above 10nm against the proposed limit 6.0E11 #/km, PN emission above 10nm were measured in our laboratory tests for both engine out and tailpipe as well as the PN emission above 23nm.

With more stringent CO2 emission regulation in the world, Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV, also known as off-vehicle charging hybrid electric vehicle, OVC-HEV) plays a more important role in the current modern market, such as in China. At the same time, Real Driving Emission (RDE) was introduced in both Euro 6d and China 6b regulation, which covers more factors in the real driving practice including altitude, environment temperature, fuel quality, driving behaviors, and so on, which could potentially impact the pollutant emissions. Besides above mentioned, for PHEV, the state of charge (SOC) of the battery is also considered as one important factor, which could impact the engine load and emissions.

The gasoline particulate filter (GPF) represents a practical solution for particulate emissions control in light-duty gasoline-fueled vehicles. It is also seen as an essential technology in North America to meet the upcoming US EPA tailpipe emission regulation, as proposed in the “Multi-pollutant Rule for Model Year 2027”. The goal of this study was to introduce advanced, uncoated GPF products and measure their particulate mass (PM) reduction performance within the existing US EPA FTP vehicle testing procedures, as detailed in Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 1066. Various state-of-the-art GPF products were characterized for their microstructure properties with lab-bench checks for pressure drop and filtration efficiency, then pre-conditioned with an EPA-recommended 1500 mile on-road break-in, and finally were tested on an AWD vehicle chassis-dyno emissions test cell at both 25°C and -7°C ambient conditions.