Search Results

It is very significant for autonomous vehicles to have the ability to operate beyond the stable handling limits, which plays a vital role in vehicles’ active safety and enhances riding and driving pleasure. For traditional vehicles, it is rather difficult to control the longitudinal speed, sideslip angle and yaw rate simultaneously when drifting along a given trajectory because they are under-actuated. Nevertheless, for a 4-wheel-independent-drive (4WID) vehicle, it is possible and controllable thanks to its over-actuated characteristics. This article designs a trajectory following control strategy for automated drifting of 4WID vehicles. First, a double-track 7 degree of freedom (7DOF) vehicle dynamic model is established, which incorporates longitudinal and lateral load transfer and considers nonlinear tire models. The controller which proposes a hierarchical architecture is then designed.

In contrast to a normal vehicle, a 4-wheel steer (4WS) and 4-wheel independent drive (4WID) vehicle provides more flexibilities in vehicle dynamic control and better handling performance, since both the steer angle and drive torque of each wheel can be controlled. However, for motorsports, how much lap time can be improved with such a vehicle is a problem few discussed. So, this paper focuses on the racing line optimization and lap time improvement for a 4WS &4WID vehicle. First, we optimize the racing line and lap time of three given circuits with the genetic algorithm (GA) and interior-point method, and several objective functions are compared. Next, to evaluate the lap time improvement of 4WS & 4WID, a detailed vehicle dynamic model of our 4WS & 4WID platform vehicle is built in Carsim. To follow the racing line, a path following controller which contains a PID speed controller and a model predictive control (MPC) yaw rate controller is built.

Compared to traditional vehicles, four-wheel independent drive and four-wheel independent steering (4WID-4WIS) vehicles have gained significant attention from researchers due to their enhanced control flexibility and superior handling performance. The steering angle deviation caused by dynamic toe angle changes in two-wheel steering (2WS) systems is often minimal and hence overlooked. However, the impact becomes notably significant in 4WIS systems. This article contrasts the tire slip angle differences between 2WS and 4WIS, and delves into the effects of dynamic toe angle variations on 4WIS control. Solutions are proposed both in terms of steering angle control and suspension design. Firstly, a dynamic model for the 4WID-4WIS vehicle is established. Secondly, a hierarchical tire force distribution strategy is designed for trajectory tracking.

Lane changing is an essential action in commercial vehicles to prevent collisions. However, steering system malfunctions significantly escalate the risk of head-on collisions. With the advancement of intelligent chassis control technologies, some autonomous commercial vehicles are now equipped with a four-wheel independent braking system. This article develops a lane-changing control strategy during steering failures using torque vectoring through brake allocation. The boundaries of lane-changing capabilities under different speeds via brake allocation are also investigated, offering valuable insights for driving safety during emergency evasions when the steering system fails. Firstly, a dual-track vehicle dynamics model is established, considering the non-linearity of the tires. A quintic polynomial approach is employed for lane-changing trajectory planning. Secondly, a hierarchical controller is designed.

To tackle the over-actuated and highly nonlinear characteristics that four-wheel-independent-steering and four-wheel-independent -driving (4WIS/4WID) vehicles exhibit when tracking aggressive trajectory, a hierarchical controller with layers of computation-intensive modules is commonly adopted. The high-level linear motion controller commands the desired state derivatives of the vehicle to meet the overall trajectory tracking objectives. Then the system dynamic is inversed by the mid-level control allocation layer and the low-level wheel control layer to map the target state derivatives to steering angle and motor torque commands. However, this type of controller is difficult to implement on the embedded hardware onboard since the nonlinear dynamic inversion is typically solved by nonlinear programming.