Search Results

Predictions from GLIMPS and HFAST design codes are compared with experimental data for the RE-1000 and SPRE free-piston Stifling engines. Engine performance and available power loss predictions are compared. Differences exist between GLIMPS and HFAST loss predictions. Both codes require engine-specific calibration to bring predictions and experimental data into agreement.

This paper summarizes the approach being used by the NASA Lewis Research Center for the long-term durability assessment of the Stirling engine hot-section components. The approach consists of: (1) preliminary Structural assessment; (2) development of a viscoplastic constitutive model to accurately determine material behavior under high-temperature thermomechanical loads, such as creep and plasticity interaction, and creep-ratcheting; (3) an experimental program to characterize material constants for the viscoplastic constitutive model, and for the short-time verification of specific materials of interest; (4) finite-element thermal analysis, and structural analysis using a viscoplastic constitutive model to obtain stress/strain/temperature at the critical location of the hot-section components for life assessment; and (5) development of a life prediction model applicable for long-term durability assessment at high temperatures.

A test facility at NASA Lewis has been assembled for evaluating: free-piston Stirling engine/linear alternator control options, and interaction with various electrical loads. This facility is based on a “SPIKE” engine/alternator. The paper describes the engine/alternator, a multi-purpose load system, a digital computer based load and facility control, and a data acquisition system with both steady-periodic and transient capability. Preliminary steady-periodic results are included for several operating modes of a digital AC parasitic load control. Preliminary results on the transient response to switching a resistive AC user load are discussed.

Under the Department of Energy's (DoE) Solar Thermal Technology Program, Sandia National Laboratories is evaluating heat engines for terrestrial Solar Distributed Heat Receivers. The Stirling engine has been identified by Sandia as one of the most promising heat engines for terrestrial applications. The Stirling engine has the potential to meet DoE's performance and cost goals [1]. The NASA Lewis Research Center is providing management of the Advanced Stirling Conversion System (ASCS) Project through an Interagency Agreement with the DoE. NASA Lewis is conducting technology development for Stirling convertors directed toward a dynamic power source for space applications. Space power requirements include high reliability with long life, high system efficiency and low vibration. The free-piston Stirling engine has the potential for both solar and nuclear space power applications.

Free-piston Stirling power converters are a candidate for high capacity space power applications. The Space Power Research Engine (SPRE), a free-piston Stirling engine coupled with a linear alternator is being tested at the NASA Lewis Research Center in support of the Civil Space Technology Initiative. The SPRE is used as a test bed for evaluating converter modifications which have the potential to improve converter performance and for validating computer code predictions. Reducing the number of cooler tubes on the SPRE has been identified as a modification with the potential to significantly improve power and efficiency. This paper describes experimental tests designed to investigate the effects of reducing the number of cooler tubes on converter power, efficiency and dynamics. Presented are test results from the converter operating with a reduced number of cooler tubes and comparisons between this data and both baseline test data and computer code predictions.