Search Results

Engine-out, cold-start (from 20°C) UHC emissions from a contemporary 2.0 4-cylinder engine with swirl control were measured with FID and FT-IR. The steady-state, end of test operation was 1500 rpm, 2.6 bar BMEP (25% load) and stoichiometric mixture. Four fuel systems were employed pintle-type port-injected gasoline, air-forced port-injected gasoline, port-injected propane, and premixed propane. These fuel systems were chosen to separate effects of fuel atomization, vaporization, and fuel-air mixing. Each system was optimized with respect to injector targeting, injection timing, mixture enrichment, and spark advance. Open-valve injection timing increased UHC emissions more with the pintle-type injector than with the air-forced, system. UHC emissions with propane injection were minimized with open valve injection.

The combustion characteristics of three gaseous fuels (hydrogen, methane and ethane) in a direct-injection stratified-charge single-cylinder engine with a centered square head-cup operated at 800 rpm (compression ratio = 10.8, squish ratio = 75%, nominal swirl ratio = 4) were studied to assess the extent to which the combustion is controlled by turbulent mixing, laminar mixing and chemical kinetics. The injection of gaseous fuels was via a Ford AFI injector, originally designed for the air-forced injection of liquid fuel. Pressure measurements in the engine cylinder and in the injector body, coupled with optical measurements of the injector poppet lift and shadowgraph images of the fuel jets provided both quantitative and qualitative information about the in-cylinder processes. To make the cases comparable, the total momentum of the fuel jets and the total heat released by the three fuels was kept the same (equivalence ratio = 0.316, 0.363, 0.329 for H2, CH4 and C2H6, respectively).