Search Results

The interest in Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS)/Large Eddy Simulation (LES) hybrids, for the simulation of turbulent flows in Internal Combustion Engines (ICE), is consistently growing. An increasing number of applications can be found in the specialized literature for the past few years, including both seamless and zonal hybrid formulations. Following this trend, we have already developed a Detached Eddy Simulation (DES)-based zonal modeling technique, which was found to have adequate scale-resolving capabilities in several engine-like reference tests. In the present article we further extend our study by evaluating the effects of the underlying turbulence model and of the grid quality/morphology on the scale-resolved part of the flow. For that purpose, we consider DES formulations based on an enhanced version of the k-g URANS model and on the URANS form of the popular RNG k-ε model.

A two-equation Zonal-DES (ZDES) approach has been recently proposed by the authors as a suitable hybrid URANS/LES turbulence modeling alternative for Internal Combustion Engine flows. This approach is conceptually simple, as it is all based on a single URANS-like framework and the user is only required to explicitly mark which parts of the domain will be simulated in URANS, DES or LES mode. The ZDES rationale was initially developed for external aerodynamics applications, where the flow is statistically steady and the transition between zones of different types usually happens in the URANS-to-DES or URANS-to-LES direction. The same “one-way” transition process has been found to be fairly efficient also in steady-state internal flows with engine-like characteristics, such as abrupt expansions or intake ports with fixed valve position.

Turbulence modeling for fuel spray simulation plays a prominent role in the understanding of the flow behavior in Internal Combustion Engines (ICEs). Currently, a lot of research work is actively spent on Large Eddy Simulation (LES) turbulence modeling as a replacement option of standard Reynolds averaged approaches in the Eulerian-Lagrangian spray modeling framework, due to its capability to accurately describe flow-induced spray variability and to the lower dependence of the results on the specific turbulence model and/or modeling coefficients. The introduction of LES poses, however, additional questions related to the implementation/adaptation of spray-related turbulence sources and to the rise of conflicting numerics and grid requirements between the Lagrangian and Eulerian parts of the simulated flow.