Search Results

There are numerous publically available smart phone applications designed to track the speed and position of the user. By accessing the phones built in GPS receivers, these applications record the position over time of the phone and report the record on the phone itself, and typically on the application’s website. These applications range in cost from free to a few dollars, with some, that advertise greater functionality, costing significantly higher. This paper examines the reliability of the data reported through these applications, and the potential for these applications to be useful in certain conditions where monitoring and recording vehicle or pedestrian movement is needed. To analyze the reliability of the applications, three of the more popular and widely used tracking programs were downloaded to three different smart phones to represent a good spectrum of operating platforms.

In the 2016 SAE publication “Data Acquisition using Smart Phone Applications,” Neale et al., evaluated the accuracy of basic fitness applications in tracking position and elevation using the GPS and accelerometer technology contained within the smart phone itself [1]. This paper further develops the research by evaluating mid-level applications. Mid-level applications are defined as ones that use a phone’s internal accelerometer and record data at 1 Hz or greater. The application can also utilize add-on devices, such as a Bluetooth enabled GPS antenna, which reports at a higher sample rate (10 Hz) than the phone by itself. These mid-level applications are still relatively easy to use, lightweight and affordable [2], [3], [4], but have the potential for higher data sample rates for the accelerometer (due to the software) and GPS signal (due to the hardware). In this paper, Harry’s Lap Timer™ was evaluated as a smart phone mid-level application.

Approaching an intersection and braking to a stop, as well as accelerating from a stop, is a common occurrence in daily life. While the experience is routine, the actual rate of deceleration and acceleration has not been analyzed from an orthogonal aerial perspective. The aerial perspective provides video footage that allows for accurate planar motion tracking and does not influence the drivers’ actions in any way. This paper examines the behavior of drivers at two separate signal light controlled intersections to determine both the rate at which they slow down to a stop, and also the rate at which they accelerate through the intersection after a signal change. The paper will also address the acceleration rate differences of vehicles who are first to reach the intersection in comparison to those that are directly behind another vehicle, as well as the lag in reaction between vehicles as they begin to accelerate from a stop.

This paper presents analyses of 21real-world pedestrian versus vehicle collisions that were video recorded from vehicle dash mounted cameras or surveillance cameras. These pedestrian collisions have in common an impact configuration where the pedestrian was at the side of the vehicle, or with a minimal overlap at the front corner of the vehicle (less than one foot overlap). These impacts would not be considered frontal impacts [1], and as a result determining the speed of the vehicle by existing methods that incorporate the pedestrian travel distance post impact, or by assessing vehicle damage, would not be applicable. This research examined the specific interaction of non-frontal, side-impact, and minimal overlap pedestrian impact configurations to assess the relationship between the speed of the vehicle at impact, the motion of the pedestrian before and after impact, and the associated post impact travel distances.

Typical everyday driving scenarios involve acceleration ranges which are relevant to accident reconstruction. Understanding the motions and accelerations endured in common driving maneuvers can help quantify the accelerations of vehicles and occupants when reconstructing a collision. This paper evaluates various everyday driving conditions, such as traversing speed bumps and dips, and impacting parking blocks. The purpose of this paper is to quantify the accelerations experienced during everyday driving scenarios to provide a reference for impact severity analysis in the field of accident reconstruction.