Search Results

Threaded fasteners or bolted joints are used extensively in automotive assemblies. There are standard procedures to evaluate joint performance under block cycles or road loads. The deciding load case for such joint design is slippage analysis of the joint. There are studies done to evaluate the theoretical and experimental behavior of these joints. There are different ways of understanding the interaction between the bolt and the nut under different loading scenarios. However, none have provided a satisfactory method of quantifying bolt loosening or loss of clamp load under cyclic loading, where no slippage is observed. Under varying loads, initial relaxation of the joint is followed by a loss of clamping load. Below a critical value, complete loss of clamping load progresses very rapidly and this results in a loose joint.

For many automotive systems it is required to calculate both the durability performance of the part and to rule out the possibility of collision of individual components during severe base shake vibration conditions. Advanced frequency domain methods now exist to enable the durability assessment to be undertaken fully in the frequency domain and utilizing the most advanced and efficient analysis tools (refs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5). In recent years new capabilities have been developed which allow hyper-sized models with multiple correlated loadcases to be processed. The most advanced stress processing (eg, complex von-Mises) and fatigue algorithms (eg, Strain-Life) are now included. Furthermore, the previously required assumptions that the loading be stationary, Gaussian and random have been somewhat relaxed. For example, mixed loading like sine on random can now be applied.

Many chassis and powertrain components in the transportation and automotive industry experience multi-axial cyclic service loading. A thorough load-history leading to durability damage should be considered in the early vehicle production steps. The key feature of rubber fatigue analysis discussed in this study is how to define local critical location strain time history based on nominal and complex load time histories. Material coupon characterization used here is the crack growth approach, based on fracture mechanics parameters. This methodology was utilized and presented for a truck engine mount. Temperature effects are not considered since proving ground (PG) loads are generated under isothermal high temperature and low frequency conditions without high amounts of self-heating.

In automotive FEA analysis, there are many components or assemblies which can be simplified to two-dimensional (2D) plane or axisymmetric analytical problems instead of three-dimensional (3D) simulation models for quick modeling and efficient analysis to meet the timing in the design development process, especially in the advanced design phase and iteration studies. Even though some situations are not perfectly planar or axisymmetric problems, they may still be approximated in 2D planar or axisymmetric models, achieving results accurate enough to meet engineering requirements. In this paper, the authors have presented and summarized several complex 3D analytical situations which can be replaced by simplified plane axisymmetric models or 2D plane strain analytical models.

Vehicle suspension parts are subjected to variable road loads, manufacturing process variation and high installation loads in assembly process. Seam welding can be considered as such process to connect more components and parts. Typical in a Mc Pherson suspension system stabilizer bar link is connected to the strut assembly through ball stud and clamped to a bracket welded to the outer strut tube. Cracks have been observed in the stabilizer bar link bracket welds of vehicles in the field, effecting the functionality of the suspension system. During preliminary phase of product development CAE assessment of the seam weld is carried out against road load data, if the design does not meet the targets enabler studies are carried out in an iterative approach. Various design variables (control factors) can be considered to carry out the iterations.