Search Results

Premium instrument panels (IPs) contain passenger airbag (PAB) systems that are typically comprised of a stiff plastic substrate and a soft ‘skin’ material which are adhesively bonded. During airbag deployment, the skin tears along the scored edges of the door holding the PAB system, the door opens, and the airbag inflates to protect the occupant. To accurately simulate the PAB deployment dynamics during a crash event all components of the instrument panel and the PAB system, including the skin, must be included in the model. It has been recognized that the material characterization and modeling of the skin tearing behavior are critical for predicting the timing and inflation kinematics of the airbag. Even so, limited data exists in the literature for skin material properties at hot and cold temperatures and at the strain rates created during the airbag deployment.

Thermoplastics find application in many automotive components. Off late, hardware testing is supplemented by analysis using finite element (FE) codes. One of the factors determining the analysis accuracy is the representation of the components with suitable material models. While a uniaxial tensile test on the specimens typically provides engineering stress-strain data, material plasticity models in commercial FE solvers, such as LS-DYNA and ABAQUS, require equivalent plastic strain versus true stress as input. Engineering stress and strain can be converted to the corresponding true stress and true strain using equations based on the constant volume assumption; however, these equations are valid only up to the point of necking.