Search Results

System lubrication in automotive powertrains is a growing topic for development engineers. Hybrid and pure combustion system complexity increases in search of improved efficiency and better control strategy, increasing the number of components with lubrication demand and the interplay between them, while fully electric systems drive for higher input speeds to increase e-motor efficiency, increasing bearing and gear feed rate demands. Added to this, many e-axle and hybrid systems are in development with a shared medium and circuit for e-motor cooling and transmission lubrication. Through all this, the lubricant forms a common thread and is a fundamental component in the system, but no standardized tests can provide a suitable methodology to investigate the adequate lubrication of components at powertrain level, to support the final planned vehicle usage.

Within gear pair development, the simulation of loaded transmission error, line of action and summarized mesh point are crucial information in design optimization as well as reliability, NVH and efficiency prediction. These properties and variables are difficult to evaluate and are usually only assessed through proxy-variables such as unloaded transmission error or contact pattern assessment. Alternatively, large design loops can be generated when prototypes are produced to directly assess the results of reliability, NVH and efficiency and simulation models updated to the results, but not directly calibrated. This work will showcase an advanced test facility with the unique capabilities to evaluate all gear contact types (including hypoid, beveloid, cylindrical and spiral) under loaded conditions while assessing position and force data that can be used to validate simulation models directly and enhance design development.

Vibration testing is common in automotive industry validation and gains greater significance with increasing numbers of electrical components, which are particularly suspectable to vibration related failures. While the nature and intention of vibration testing is common, many contradicting testing standards claim to be a one-size-fits-all solution, leading to questions of which standard is correct for any specific application. This is compounded by the vast variation in vehicle types and applications (suspension systems, dampers, powertrain mass, tire radius, intended usage, etc.) This paper seeks to offer and demonstrate a method to determine characteristic vibration profiles, based on vehicle classes, and illuminate the process to accelerate these to an appropriate test profile. This can either be used to directly validate a system or to support the selection of the most appropriate vibration profile from options within standards.

Minimizing the lubricant volume in a transmission system reduces the churning losses and overall unit costs. However, lubricant volume reduction is also detrimental to the thermal stability of the system. Transmission overheating can result in significant issues in the region of loaded contacts, risking severe surface/sub-surface damage in bearings and gears, as well as reduction in the lubricant quality through advanced oxidation and shear degradation. The increasing trend of electrified transmission input speeds raises the importance of understanding the thermal limits of the system at the envelope of the performance to ensure quality and reliability can be maintained, as well as being a key factor in the development, effecting internal housing features for the promotion of lubrication. A nodal bearing thermal model will be shown which utilizes thermal resistances and smooth particle based CFD for determining bearing lubricant feed rates during operation.

As electrified powertrains trends towards the new norm in development, the need to consider modular development approaches becomes more prevalent. Modular system developments seek to offer an adaptable product range by considering each system component (transmission, e-motor, inverter, battery, etc.) and system element (park-lock, disconnect, differential, etc.) as interchangeable. This can result in a lower cost development process overall to increase the returns for tier1 suppliers by expanding the marketability of the platform. Such an approach has hitherto held relatively low commercial interest as the rate of technological advancement negated the benefits of a modular development due to the lack of long-term competitivity. Previously large technological advances between successive productions and the relatively limited EV market, centred around SUV and small car applications, reduced the value in committing to a platform development.